首页> 外文期刊>Journal of management & governance >The hidden ethics of corporate governance and the practical uses of corporate governance codes: a commentary on Bhimani
【24h】

The hidden ethics of corporate governance and the practical uses of corporate governance codes: a commentary on Bhimani

机译:公司治理的隐藏伦理和公司治理守则的实际使用:对Bhimani的评论

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Professor Bhimani suggests that corporate governance codes have adopted a particular ethics associated with economic rationalism. I discuss why those ethics may discourage managers from acting in the spirit of those codes by comparing the organisational consequences of the external requirements of financial reporting with those of corporate governance reporting. Bhimani takes issue with the ways in which highly particular codes of moral behaviour have been slipped into corporate governance rules. He shows how the reliance of corporate governance rules on certain economic rationales, as articulated, for example, by agency theory, transaction cost economics, stakeholder theory and stewardship theory, gives rise to a highly specific ethics. Despite the differences between those theories all of them are rooted in economic rationalism because they share certain assumptions. For example, enterprises seek wealth maximisation, human motivation is acquisitive, and managers are self-interested. The codification of corporate behaviour which drives the corporate governance project affords the opportunity to standardise a particular ethics through the reliance on economic rationalism in ways not seen before. One problem with this is that rules of corporate governance exhort companies to follow those ethics without ever offering a clear justification. The ethics are simply adopted wholesale from economic rationalism.
机译:Bhimani教授建议,公司治理守则采用了与经济理性主义相关的特殊道德。我将通过比较财务报告的外部要求和公司治理报告的外部要求对组织的影响,来讨论为什么这些道德操守会阻止经理人遵循这些守则的精神行事。 Bhimani质疑道德行为守则中非常特殊的规则已被纳入公司治理规则的方式。他展示了公司治理规则对某些经济原理的依赖,如代理理论,交易成本经济学,利益相关者理论和管理理论所阐明的,是如何产生高度特定的伦理的。尽管这些理论之间存在差异,但所有这些理论都植根于经济理性主义,因为它们共享某些假设。例如,企业追求财富最大化,人为追求动机,而经理则出于自身利益。推动公司治理项目的公司行为法典化提供了通过以前所未有的方式依靠经济理性主义来规范特定道德规范的机会。这样做的一个问题是,公司治理规则要求公司遵循这些道德准则,而没有提供明确的理由。道德只是从经济理性主义中全面采用的。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号