...
首页> 外文期刊>The BE Journal of Macroeconomics >Leaning-Against-the-Wind: Which Policy and When?
【24h】

Leaning-Against-the-Wind: Which Policy and When?

机译:倾向于风:哪个政策和时间何时?

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

This paper quantitatively examines which of the following three widelyused leaning-against-the-wind policies is effective in stabilizing aggregate fluctuations: i) a monetary policy that responds to the loan-to-GDP ratio, ii) a countercyclical LTV policy, and iii) a countercyclical capital requirement policy. In particular, we estimate a New Keynesian model with financial frictions using U.S. data and find that a monetary policy rule that responds positively to the loan-to-GDP ratio Amplifies the macroeconomic fluctuations while a countercyclical LTV policy has almost no effect. On the contrary, a countercyclical capital requirement policy is the most desirable in stabilizing GDP, inflation, and loans. However, the stabilization effect of the optimal countercyclical capital requirement policy is concentrated during periods in which financial shocks played a large role.
机译:本文定量审查以下三个广泛使用的哪三个倾向于风政策在稳定总体波动方面是有效的:i)响应贷款 - GDP比率,ii)对反周期性LTV政策以及III的货币政策 )反周期资本要求政策。 特别是,我们使用美国数据估计具有金融摩擦的新凯恩斯主义模型,并发现一个货币策略规则,以积极响应贷款到GDP比率,同时逆行LTV政策几乎没有影响。 相反,反周期资本要求政策是稳定GDP,通货膨胀和贷款的最理想。 但是,在金融冲击发挥了重要作用的期间,最佳反周期资本需求政策的稳定效果集中在一起。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号