...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Lightwave Technology >Variable-Bandwidth Optical Paths: Comparison Between Optical Code-Labeled Path and OCDM Path
【24h】

Variable-Bandwidth Optical Paths: Comparison Between Optical Code-Labeled Path and OCDM Path

机译:可变带宽光路:光代码标签路径和OCDM路径之间的比较

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

In a conventional wavelength-routed network, the bandwidth of one wavelength is considered as the minimum granularity for a given connection request. Therefore, no multiple connection requests can be accepted by using a single wavelength simultaneously. This may cause inefficiency in the bandwidth utilization in some cases. In this paper, the focus is on the variable-bandwidth approach called an optical code (OC)-based path to improve this bandwidth utilization. The concept of OC-enabling paths is investigated, which shows its potential in resolving the above granularity problem inherent to the wavelength-routed network. First, two optical paths, called the OC-labeled and OC division multiplexing (OCDM) paths, are proposed. The former is based upon label switching and statistical multiplexing, while the latter is based upon OCDM. Next, OC-label and OCDM optical cross connects are described to support OC-labeled and OCDM paths, respectively. In this paper, a coherent time-spread OC is adopted. A two-state flow-fluid traffic model is addressed and regarded as the general analysis model. Finally, the performances between these proposed paths are qualified and compared, and numerical results show that the OC-labeled path outperforms the OCDM path under short burst duration time, whereas the OCDM path, provides higher flexibility than the OC-labeled path, owing to its independence of burst duration time.
机译:在常规的波长路由网络中,一个波长的带宽被视为给定连接请求的最小粒度。因此,不能通过同时使用单个波长来接受多个连接请求。在某些情况下,这可能会导致带宽利用效率低下。在本文中,重点是被称为基于光码(OC)的路径的可变带宽方法,以提高带宽利用率。对OC启用路径的概念进行了研究,显示了其在解决上述波长路由网络固有的粒度问题方面的潜力。首先,提出了两种称为OC标记和OC分区复用(OCDM)的光路。前者基于标签交换和统计复用,而后者基于OCDM。接下来,描述OC标签和OCDM光学交叉连接以分别支持OC标签和OCDM路径。本文采用了一种一致的时间扩展OC。提出了一种二态流-流体交通模型并将其视为通用分析模型。最后,对这些拟议路径之间的性能进行了比较和验证,数值结果表明,在短脉冲持续时间下,OC标记的路径性能优于OCDM路径,而OCDM路径比OC标记的路径具有更高的灵活性,这是由于它与爆发持续时间无关。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号