...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Land Use & Environmental Law >ASSESSING THE VALIDITY OF LINKING PROGRAMS: A CASE STUDY OF DESTIN, FLORIDA'S INNOVATIVE ATTAINABLE WORKFORCE HOUSING PROGRAM
【24h】

ASSESSING THE VALIDITY OF LINKING PROGRAMS: A CASE STUDY OF DESTIN, FLORIDA'S INNOVATIVE ATTAINABLE WORKFORCE HOUSING PROGRAM

机译:评估链接程序的有效性:以DESTIN为例,佛罗里达州的创新型可实现劳动力住房计划

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

A linkage program meant to increase workforce housing is likely to withstand a legal challenge. A challenger will be unable to show that the local government does not have the authority to regulate affordable housing. If courts cannot find a statutory authority for such action, they traditionally hold that the zoning stems from the municipality's police power. Likewise, an ordinance like the one in Destin will likely withstand an equal protection challenge because the classification it creates is rationally related to the government's legitimate purpose of providing affordable housing. Based on similar reasoning, a challenger will also likely lose on substantive due process grounds. Finally, a court will likely find that an ordinance like the one in Destin does not constitute a Fifth Amendment taking.
机译:旨在增加劳动力住房的联动计划可能会面临法律挑战。挑战者将无法证明地方政府无权监管经济适用房。如果法院无法找到采取这种行动的法定机构,则传统上认为分区是由市政当局的警察权力决定的。同样,像《德斯汀》中的一项法令很可能会承受同样的保护挑战,因为该法令所产生的分类与政府提供可负担住房的合法目的合理相关。基于类似的推理,挑战者也可能会因实质性的正当程序理由而败诉。最终,法院可能会发现类似《德斯汀》中的一项法令并不构成《第五修正案》的采纳。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号