首页> 外文期刊>Journal of the Japanese and International Economies >Trade Diversion and Trade Deficits: The Case of the Korea-U.S. Free Trade Agreement
【24h】

Trade Diversion and Trade Deficits: The Case of the Korea-U.S. Free Trade Agreement

机译:贸易转移和贸易赤字:韩国 - 美国的案例。自由贸易协定

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

We study whether tariff preferences conferred on South Korean goods through the implementation of the KoreaU.S. Free Trade Agreement (KORUS) drew U.S. import demand away from other U.S. trading partners through the phenomenon known as trade diversion. In the two years following the implementation of KORUS, trade diversion was particularly strong for U.S. imports of consumption goods and for trade partners who already had free trade agreements with the U.S. Our estimates of trade diversion sum to $13.1 billion in 2013 and $13.8 billion in 2014. Notably, these estimates of trade diversion are roughly of the same magnitude as the increase in the U.S. bilateral goods trade deficit with South Korea. Thus, while increased U.S. imports from South Korea may have increased the U.S.-South Korea bilateral trade deficit, the fact that KORUS diverted U.S. import demand away from other trading partners implies new U.S. imports from Korea stimulated by the KORUS did not expand the overall U.S. trade deficit.
机译:我们研究资费偏好是否通过实施韩国商品赋予韩国商品。自由贸易协定(korus)通过称为贸易转移的现象,将美国进口需求从其他美国进口需求中取得越来越多。在执行康斯的实施后两年内,贸易转移对于美国的消费商品和贸易伙伴的进口尤其强大,贸易伙伴已经与美国的贸易转让总额估计到2013年的131亿美元和2014年的138亿美元。特别是,这些贸易转移估计数量大致与韩国美国双边商品贸易逆差的增加相同。因此,虽然来自韩国的美国进口量增加了美国 - 韩国双边贸易赤字,但古兰斯转移了美国进口需求的事实暗示来自韩国的新美国进口古兰经刺激并没有扩大美国的整体贸易赤字。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号