...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of irrigation and drainage engineering >Comparative Study of Time Series Models, Support Vector Machines, and GMDH in Forecasting Long-Term Evapotranspiration Rates in Northern Iran
【24h】

Comparative Study of Time Series Models, Support Vector Machines, and GMDH in Forecasting Long-Term Evapotranspiration Rates in Northern Iran

机译:时间序列模型,支持向量机和GMDH在预测伊朗北部长期蒸腾速率中的比较研究

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

Evapotranspiration estimation and forecasting is a key step in water management projects, especially in water-scarce countries such as Iran. Seasonal autoregressive integrated moving average (SARIMA), support vector machine (SVM), and group method of data handling (GMDH) models were developed and assessed to find an appropriate model for short and long-term forecasting of monthly reference evapotranspiration in the Guilan Plain, northern Iran. Monthly meteorological data gathered from four weather stations (Anzali, Astara, Manjil, and Rasht) were used to calculate monthly reference evapotranspiration in the period of 1993-2014 using the FAO-56 Penman-Monteith (FAO-PM) equation. The evapotranspiration data from 1993 to 2012 were used to fit SARIMA models and calibrate SVM and GMDH models, and the monthly evapotranspiration rates for the years 2013 and 2014 were forecasted using the calibrated models. The developed models were assessed using RMS error (RMSE), the Pearson correlation coefficient (R), the Nash-Sutcliffe model efficiency coefficient (NS), and percent bias. Taylor diagrams also were used to compare the accuracy of forecasts produced by the models. For the whole forecasting period (2013-2014), the RMSE of the calibrated SARIMA, SVM, and GMDH models were, respectively, 8.796,9.830, and 9.547 mm/month for Anzali weather station; 8.136, 9.057, and 7.808 mm/month for Astara weather station; 9.454, 8.947, and 8.876 mm/month for Manjil weather station; and 9.301, 10.509, and 10.138 mm/month for Rasht weather station. In other words, in two weather stations under study (Anzali and Rasht), the best results were obtained from SARIMA; however, for Astara and Manjil weather stations, GMDH generated the best forecasts. Furthermore, at different forecasting horizons (1-24 months), the SARIMA models generally outperformed the SVM and GMDH models.
机译:蒸散估算和预报是水管理项目中的关键步骤,尤其是在伊朗等缺水国家。开发并评估了季节性自回归综合移动平均线(SARIMA),支持向量机(SVM)和分组数据处理(GMDH)模型,以找到合适的模型来对桂兰平原月参考蒸散量进行短期和长期预测,伊朗北部。使用FAO-56 Penman-Monteith(FAO-PM)方程,使用从四个气象站(Anzali,Astara,Manjil和Rasht)收集的每月气象数据来计算1993-2014年期间的每月参考蒸散量。使用1993年至2012年的蒸散数据拟合SARIMA模型并校准SVM和GMDH模型,并使用校正后的模型预测2013年和2014年的月蒸散率。使用RMS误差(RMSE),Pearson相关系数(R),Nash-Sutcliffe模型效率系数(NS)和偏差百分比评估开发的模型。泰勒图还用于比较模型产生的预测的准确性。在整个预测期间(2013-2014年),安扎里气象站的校准SARIMA,SVM和GMDH模型的均方根误差分别为8.796、9.830和9.547毫米/月; Astara气象站的月度为8.136、9.057和7.808毫米/月; Manjil气象站的每月9.454、8.947和8.876毫米;和Rasht气象站的9.301、10.509和10.138毫米/月。换句话说,在正在研究的两个气象站(Anzali和Rasht)中,从SARIMA获得了最好的结果。但是,对于Astara和Manjil气象站,GMDH产生了最佳预报。此外,在不同的预测范围(1-24个月)中,SARIMA模型通常优于SVM和GMDH模型。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号