首页> 外文期刊>Journal of internet law >Data Privacy and Intermediary Liability: Striking a Balance Between Privacy, Reputation, Innovation, and Freedom of Expression
【24h】

Data Privacy and Intermediary Liability: Striking a Balance Between Privacy, Reputation, Innovation, and Freedom of Expression

机译:数据隐私和中介责任:在隐私,声誉,创新和表达自由之间寻求平衡

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

This article has touched on only some of the issues that have been raised by the Costeja case. There are many more-and this is just in regard to English law. If the position was not complicated enough for Internet intermediaries before Costeja, it has just got a whole lot worse. Some clarity and consistency is needed. When the DP Directive was enacted in 1996 and the E-Commerce Directive was enacted shortly after in 2000, Google had not been established long and was a long way off being the dominant search provider that it is today, Facebook, and Twitter were several years away from existence, and mobile phones (without Internet connection) were just starting to take-off. We now inhabit a completely different world and the way we find information has completely changed. The laws therefore need to change too-without simply trying to interpret old laws to fit new surroundings.
机译:本文仅涉及Costeja案提出的一些问题。还有更多-这仅与英国法律有关。如果在Costeja之前,对于互联网中介机构而言,这个职位还不够复杂,那么情况就更糟了。需要一定的清晰度和一致性。当DP指令于1996年颁布,而E-Commerce指令于2000年之后不久颁布时,Google的成立时间不长,与今天的主要搜索提供商,Facebook和Twitter相比,还有很长的路要走不再存在,手机(没有互联网连接)才刚刚起步。我们现在生活在一个完全不同的世界中,而我们寻找信息的方式已经完全改变。因此,法律也需要改变,而不仅仅是尝试解释旧法律以适应新环境。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号