首页> 外文期刊>Journal of International Trade Law and Policy >The Letter of Credit, its resilience and viability in securing international commercial transactions
【24h】

The Letter of Credit, its resilience and viability in securing international commercial transactions

机译:信用证,其在确保国际商业交易中的弹性和可行性

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Purpose - This paper aims to address issues of law and policy, the potential pitfalls such as fraud, conflict of law and documents discrepancies that are often encountered by the parties in usage and practice of the Letter of Credit (IX). The article has gleaned other forms of payment mechanisms in international commercial trade to demonstrate that despite the upsurge in international payment instruments, the LC has remained a viable commercial product. This article aims to provide an in-depth analysis of the law governing the LC and why it has remained resilient and a viable commercial product for many years. Design/methodology/approach - The author has utilized the current version of UCP 600 (2007) and the legislation such as Brussels Convention (2000) in Europe, litigated cases and secondary data sources in writing the paper. The data generated were then evaluated taking into account the most recent legal and policy changes regarding the usage and practice of the LC in international commercial transactions. The paper straddles many issues but evaluated in a distinctive way to underscore the purpose for writing it. Findings-The findings of the paper have demonstrated that despite a myriad of payment mechanisms as a result of innovation in international trade, the LC is still a viable commercial product. Parties will need to be knowledgeable and skilled enough to keep abreast of dynamic changes on law and policy relating to usage and practice of LCs. Short of that parties could be vulnerable to risk exigencies inherent in international trade they sought to eliminate by subscribing to the LC. Research limitations/implications - The limitations lie in realm that the paper was largely library-based and the author did not carry out extensive corroborative research studies on issues it was written on. Thus, any future work on the LC will try to corroborate issues of policy and practice and how they are internalized in commercial practice. Practical implications - The paper has articulated the governing law of the LC and the context in which it is harnessed in commercial practice. It has articulated potential risk areas that the parties ought to watch out for before and during the process of harnessing the LC as a payment mechanism. The paper has demonstrated that risks inherent in international trade are now higher than in past decades because of globalization and its attendant fluid environment. The paper is relevant to banks, regulators, governments and also students because it internalizes most recent changes in the usage and practice of the LCs in international trade. Social implications - International trade affects local businesses, banks, ordinary people, national governments and it has far reaching implications for societies as whole. The LC is utilized to mitigate, if not eliminate, potential risks in international trade transactions, and it has far reaching social implications for economies to be overlooked. Originality/value - The article has gleaned other forms of payment mechanisms in international commercial trade to tease out that despite the upsurge in international payment mechanisms, the LC has remained a viable commercial product. This article is a MUST read because it internalizes recent changes in the usage and practice of documentary credit which have not been addressed in its context. Even though the article has been undertaken by analysis of secondary and primary data sources, the author has done so in a distinctive way to underscore the most recent changes to the usage and practice of the LC and the purpose it was written.
机译:目的-本文旨在解决法律和政策问题,潜在的陷阱,例如欺诈,法律冲突以及当事方在使用和实践信用证(IX)时经常遇到的单据差异。该文章收集了国际商业贸易中的其他形式的支付机制,以证明尽管国际支付工具激增,但信用证仍然是可行的商业产品。本文旨在提供有关LC的法律的深入分析,以及为何LC多年来保持弹性和可行的商业产品。设计/方法/方法-作者在撰写本文时使用了UCP 600(2007)的当前版本以及欧洲的《布鲁塞尔公约》(2000)等法律,诉讼案件和辅助数据源。然后,在考虑到有关国际商业交易中信用证的使用和实践的最新法律和政策变化之后,对生成的数据进行评估。该论文跨越了许多问题,但以独特的方式进行了评估,以强调其目的。调查结果-该论文的调查结果表明,尽管国际贸易创新带来了多种支付机制,但信用证仍然是可行的商业产品。缔约方将需要足够的知识和技能,以跟上与信用证的使用和实践有关的法律和政策的动态变化。如果缺少这些缔约方,他们很可能会通过订购LC消除国际贸易中固有的风险要求。研究局限性/含义-局限性在于该论文主要基于图书馆,并且作者并未针对所写问题进行广泛的确证研究。因此,有关LC的任何未来工作都将试图证实政策和实践问题以及它们如何在商业实践中内化。实际意义-本文阐明了LC的适用法律及其在商业实践中的运用背景。它阐明了在利用信用证作为支付机制之前和过程中各方应注意的潜在风险领域。该文件表明,由于全球化及其伴随的动荡环境,国际贸易固有的风险现在比过去几十年要高。该文件与银行,监管机构,政府以及学生有关,因为它可以将国际信用证的使用和实践中的最新变化内在化。社会影响-国际贸易影响本地企业,银行,普通百姓,国家政府,对整个社会具有深远的影响。信用证被用来减轻,甚至消除国际贸易交易中的潜在风险,它对被忽视的经济具有深远的社会影响。原创性/价值-该文章收集了国际商业贸易中的其他形式的支付机制,以说明尽管国际支付机制兴起,但信用证仍然是可行的商业产品。本文是必读的,因为它将跟单信用证的用法和实践的最新更改内在化,而在上下文中尚未解决。即使本文是通过分析辅助数据源和主要数据源来完成的,但作者还是以独特的方式强调了LC的用法和实践及其编写目的的最新变化。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号