首页> 外文期刊>Journal of International Trade Law and Policy >China's NME status at the WTO: analysis of the debate
【24h】

China's NME status at the WTO: analysis of the debate

机译:中国WTO的NME现状:辩论分析

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Purpose - Although officially ended in July 2020, China's dispute about its non-market economy (NME) status at the World Trade Organization (WTO) is far from being resolved. The NME status enables China's counterparts to disregard Chinese prices in antidumping proceedings and instead use the so-called surrogate country methodology. This paper aims to structure and analyze the complex debate, which emerged with the disputes China has filed against the European Union and the USA at the WTO, and therefore provide a point of reference for future analysis of and debates about China's NME status. Design/methodology/approach - The analysis is based on the existing academic literature on the topic and on the legal WTO-related documents (e.g. multilateral agreements, China's Accession Protocol, legal findings of the WTO dispute panels). Findings - Four different interpretations of the respective legal documents about China's NME status are discussed and strong and weak aspects of these interpretations are pointed out. Also, several misunderstandings and mistakes appearing in the debate are clarified. Practical implications - As the question of China's position at the WTO and its NME status has not been resolved yet and some authors believe that China will pursue its case again once the WTO Appellate Body revives its functionality, the analysis of the debate can serve as a point of reference for the academic debate and the future research on this topic. Moreover, it offers an introduction to China's NME position at the WTO for the newcomers to this topic. Originality/value - Although China's NME status has been much discussed, there is no literature review that would structure the debate and point out some of the (disadvantages of the respective arguments and interpretations. Rather than adding to the large corpus of literature about the NME status, this study takes this corpus as the object of its analysis.
机译:目的 - 尽管在2020年7月正式结束时,中国对世界贸易组织(WTO)的非市场经济(NME)地位的争端远未得到解决。 NME状态使中国的同行能够无视中国价格在反倾销程序中,而是使用所谓的代理国家方法。本文旨在构建和分析复杂的辩论,这些辩论与中国在WTO上提起的争端,并因此提供了对中国NME地位的未来分析和辩论的参考点。设计/方法/方法 - 分析基于对该主题的现有学术文献以及与法律WTO相关的文件(例如,中国加入议定书,WTO争议面板的法律调查结果)。调查结果 - 讨论了关于中国NME地位的各自法律文件的四种不同的解释,并指出了这些解释的强大和弱势方面。此外,澄清了争论中出现的几个误解和错误。实际意义 - 作为中国WTO地位的问题及其NME地位尚未得到解决,一些作者认为,当WTO上诉机构恢复其功能后,中国将再次追求其案例,对辩论的分析可以作为一个学术辩论的参考和对此主题的未来研究。此外,它为中国WTO的NME位置介绍了这个主题的新人。原创性/价值 - 虽然中国的NME状态已经讨论了很多,但没有文献综述将构建辩论并指出一些(各自论据和解释的缺点。而不是加入关于NME的大型文学语料库状态,本研究将此语料库作为其分析的对象。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号