...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of International Economics >Intergovernmental transfers and fiscal behavior insurance versus aggregate discipline
【24h】

Intergovernmental transfers and fiscal behavior insurance versus aggregate discipline

机译:政府间转移支付和财政行为保险与综合纪律

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

This paper evaluates the trade-off between the advantages of risk sharing and the perils of common pool problems in federal fiscal arrangements. Under the assumption of asymmetric information we evaluate two alternative regimes of intergovernmental transfers. In one regime, the central government pre-commits to a certain level of transfers that compensate vertical fiscal imbalances and provide some limited ex-ante insurance. In the other regime, it accommodates ex-post the fiscal needs of the different provinces. In this second case, full-insurance results, but the economy is subject to a tragedy of the fiscal commons, with excessive subnational spending, insufficient local taxation, and reduced production of federal public goods. We find the range of parameters for which one or the other institutional regime will be preferable. The result is a fiscal-federalism version of the usual trade-off between rules and discretion.
机译:本文评估了风险分担的优势与联邦财政安排中共同资产池问题的风险之间的权衡。在信息不对称的假设下,我们评估了政府间转移的两种替代机制。在一种体制下,中央政府预先承诺一定程度的转移支付,以补偿纵向财政失衡并提供一些有限的事前保险。在另一种体制中,它可以满足不同省份的事后财政需求。在第二种情况下,将产生全额保险,但经济将遭受财政公地的悲剧,地方政府支出过多,地方税收不足,联邦公共产品的产量减少。我们发现一个或另一个制度制度将更可取的参数范围。结果是在规则和自由裁量权之间通常进行权衡的财政联邦主义版本。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号