首页> 外文期刊>Journal of International Economic Law >The Role of Rules of Origin to Provide Discipline to the Gatt Article XXIV Exception
【24h】

The Role of Rules of Origin to Provide Discipline to the Gatt Article XXIV Exception

机译:原产地规则在加特第二十四条例外规定中的作用

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

This article examines how the GATT Article XXIV regional trade agreement (RTA) exception can be strengthened to curb the proliferation of RTAs that maintain questionable levels of trade liberalization. The lack of rigorous application of the ‘substantially all the trade’ requirement and the use of rules of origin in a restrictive manner are persistent problems that have led to the exclusion of products that should otherwise be part of trade liberalization under RTAs. To provide the discipline currently lacking in Article XXIV, the internal trade under an RTA should be based upon ‘non-preferential rules of origin’ (NPROO) so that trade barriers between RTA parties with respect to ‘substantially all the trade’ will be eliminated. Furthermore, restrictive preferential rules of origin should be eliminated by replacing them with harmonized NPROO. NPROO therefore not only help define the proper scope of trade coverage for RTAs, but they also provide the proper standard to ensure that RTA rules of origin do not become impermissibly restrictive.
机译:本文探讨了如何加强关贸总协定第二十四条区域贸易协定(RTA)例外情况,以遏制维持可疑贸易自由化水平的RTAs的泛滥。缺乏严格执行“基本上所有贸易”要求以及以限制性方式使用原产地规则是持续存在的问题,导致将产品排除在外,而这些产品本应作为RTAs贸易自由化的一部分。为了提供当前在第二十四条中缺乏的纪律,在RTA下的内部贸易应基于“非优惠原产地规则”(NPROO),以便消除RTA双方之间关于“基本上所有贸易”的贸易壁垒。 。此外,应通过用统一的NPROO代替限制性的优惠原产地规则。因此,NPROO不仅帮助定义了RTAs的贸易覆盖范围,而且还提供了适当的标准以确保RTA的原产地规则不会受到不允许的限制。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号