首页> 外文期刊>Journal of International Criminal Justice >Distinguishing Military and Non-military Superiors
【24h】

Distinguishing Military and Non-military Superiors

机译:区分军事和非军事上级

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

The article deals with the distinction between military and non-military superiors. As Article 28 of the Rome Statute sets forth different requirements of superior responsibility for military and non-military superiors, it has become necessary to distinguish between the two types of superiors. In the recent confirmation of charges decision in the Bemba case before the International Criminal Court, the Pre-Trial Chamber qualified Bemba as a military commander. The author analyses this decision and discusses the distinguishing features of military and non-military superiors and their appropriateness for the purposes of Article 28. The author argues that the military or non-military status of the superior is dependent on the unit or entity in which the superior is incorporated. A military commander may be defined as a superior in a unit whose underlying rationale is to act or be deployed as a party to an armed conflict, whereas a non-military superior belongs to an entity that does not have such a purpose.
机译:文章论述了军事上级与非军事上级之间的区别。由于《罗马规约》第二十八条对军事和非军事上级提出了不同的上级责任要求,因此有必要区分两种上级。在国际刑事法院最近确认的本巴案指控决定中,预审分庭将本巴任命为军事指挥官。作者分析了这一决定,并讨论了军事和非军事上级的区别特征及其在第二十八条中的适用性。作者认为,上级的军事或非军事地位取决于所在单位或实体。上级公司成立。军事指挥官可以被定义为单位的上级,其基本原理是作为武装冲突的一方行事或被部署为武装冲突的一方,而非军事上级则属于没有此目的的实体。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号