首页> 外文期刊>Journal of informetrics >Knowledge recency to the birth of Nobel Prize-winning articles: Gender, career stage, and country
【24h】

Knowledge recency to the birth of Nobel Prize-winning articles: Gender, career stage, and country

机译:诺贝尔奖获奖物品诞生的知识新闻:性别,职业阶段和国家

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Scientific ideas seldom come entirely from nothing; they often originate from existing knowledge. In this study, we aim to identify the relationship between the knowledge recency and Nobel Prize-winning articles (NPs) from the perspectives of gender, career stage, and country of the originators. Scientific literatures published by Nobel laureates in the Physiology or Medicine field are treated as NPs, and the age of references cited in those literatures are considered a measurement of knowledge recency. Results show that most NPs in this field have been focused on literature with a low mean and median recency, and over half of these works have cited equal to or more than 68 % of recent literature published within five years. Contrary to traditional wisdom, the greatest discoveries made after 1980 have shown an increasing favor to older literature. We also find that there has been no gender gap for the recency of NPs; however, career stage has been an important factor influencing knowledge recency, which means older researchers tend to cite more earlier articles than others. (C) 2020 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
机译:科学思想很少从中完全完全进入;他们经常源自现有知识。在这项研究中,我们的目标是从性别,职业阶段和发起人的国家的角度来确定知识新闻和诺贝尔奖获奖物品(NPS)之间的关系。诺贝尔奖酶在生理学或医学领域发表的科学文献被视为NPS,在这些文献中引用的参考资料的年龄被视为知识新闻的测量。结果表明,该领域的大多数NPS一直专注于均值低于平均和中位数的文学,其中一半的作品引用了五年内出版的最近文学的一半以上的68%。与传统智慧相反,1980年以后的最大发现表现出对旧文学的越来越大。我们还发现,NPS的新近度没有性别差距;然而,职业阶段一直是影响知识新近的重要因素,这意味着老年的研究人员倾向于引用比其他人更早期的文章。 (c)2020 elestvier有限公司保留所有权利。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号