...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of information systems >Trust but Verify: The Oracle Paradox of Blockchain Smart Contracts
【24h】

Trust but Verify: The Oracle Paradox of Blockchain Smart Contracts

机译:信任但验证:区块链智能合同的Oracle Paradox

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Although research shows that blockchain provides fairly immutable virtual provenance workflows, proof that the blockchain accurately represents physical events lacks truly independent verification. This dilemma, the Oracle Paradox, challenges blockchain architecture and is perhaps one reason why businesses have hesitated to adopt smart contracts. Blockchain proponents claim that people can serve as trusted Oracles in a smart contract. However, auditing research shows that people are the weak link in almost every internal control application, including those pertaining to blockchain. People are susceptible to collusion, bribery, error, and fraud and these tendencies are not entirely mitigated by blockchain technologies (Balagurusamy et al. 2019; Nakamoto 2008). This research proposes a framework to mitigate the paradox of the Oracle: A Business Process Management ( BPM) model of a Blockchain Smart Contract-enabled supply chain with IoT as the sole ``third-party'' Oracle participant, utilizing design science research.
机译:虽然研究表明,BlockChain提供了相当不变的虚拟出处工作流,但证明区块链准确表示物理事件缺乏真正独立的验证。这种困境,Oracle Paradox,挑战区块链式架构,也许是企业犹豫不决的一个原因是通过智能合同。 BlockChain支持者声称人们可以在智能合同中作为可信奥克斯。然而,审计研究表明,人们几乎在几乎每个内部控制申请中都是薄弱的联系,包括与区块链有关的应用程序。人们易受勾结,贿赂,错误和欺诈,这些趋势并不完全由区块链技术(Balagurusamy等,2019; Nakamoto 2008)。本研究提出了一种框架,用于减轻Oracle的悖论:一个业务流程管理(BPM)模型的Slinchain智能合同的供应链,其中包含IOT作为唯一的“第三方”的Oracle参与者,利用设计科学研究。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号