首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Indian Philosophy >Prāsaṅgika Epistemology: A Reply to Stag tsang’s Charge Against Tsongkhapa’s Uses of Pramāṇa in Candrakīrti’s Philosophy
【24h】

Prāsaṅgika Epistemology: A Reply to Stag tsang’s Charge Against Tsongkhapa’s Uses of Pramāṇa in Candrakīrti’s Philosophy

机译:Prāsaṅgika认识论:回应曾宪兵对宗喀巴大师在坎德拉基蒂哲学中使用普拉玛的指控

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Stag tsang, amongst others, has argued that any use of mundane pramāṇa—authoritative cognition—is incompatible with the Prāsaṅgika system. His criticism of Tsongkhapa’s interpretation of Candrakīrti’s Madhyamaka which insists on the uses of pramāṇa (tha snyad pa’i tshad ma)—authoritative cognition—within the Prāsaṅgika philosophical context is that it is contradictory and untenable. This paper is my defence of Tsongkhapa’s approach to pramāṇa in the Prāsaṅgika philosophy. By showing that Tsongkhapa consistently adopts a non-foundationalist approach in his interpretation of the Prāsaṅgika’s epistemology, and by showing that he emphatically denies any place for the foundationalist epistemology of Dignāga and Dharmakīrti in the Prāsaṅgika system, I will argue that Tsongkhapa’s epistemology emerges from Stag tsang’s criticisms unscathed.
机译:曾志雄(Stag tsang)等人认为,凡俗的普拉玛语(权威认知)的任何使用都与普拉萨吉卡系统不兼容。他对宗喀巴党对坎德拉基蒂的《中央大帝》的解释的批评,认为在普拉萨吉卡哲学的语境中坚持使用权威性认知-普拉那(tha snyad pa’i tshad ma),这是相互矛盾且站不住脚的。本文是我对宗喀巴大师普拉萨(Prāsaṅgika)哲学中的方法的辩护。通过证明宗喀巴大师在解释普拉萨基卡的认识论时始终采用非基础主义的方法,并通过表明他在否定普拉萨基卡系统的狄尼加和达摩基蒂的基础主义认识论中没有任何地方,我将论证宗喀巴派的认识论曾荫权的批评毫发无损。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号