...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of hydrologic engineering >Uncertainty Quantification in Flood Inundation Mapping Using Generalized Likelihood Uncertainty Estimate and Sensitivity Analysis
【24h】

Uncertainty Quantification in Flood Inundation Mapping Using Generalized Likelihood Uncertainty Estimate and Sensitivity Analysis

机译:基于广义似然不确定度估计和敏感性分析的洪水淹没测图不确定度量化

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

The process of creating flood inundation maps is affected by uncertainties in data, modeling approaches, parameters, and geo-processing tools. Generalized likelihood uncertainty estimation (GLUE) is one of the popular techniques used to represent uncertainty in model predictions through Monte Carlo analysis coupled with Bayesian estimation. The objectives of this study are to (1) compare the uncertainty arising from multiple variables in flood inundation mapping using Monte Carlo simulations and GLUE and (2) investigate the role of subjective selection of the GLUE likelihood measure in quantifying uncertainty in flood inundation mapping. The role of the flow, topography, and roughness coefficient is investigated on the output of a one-dimensional Hydrologic Engineering Center-River Analysis System (HEC-RAS) model and flood inundation map for an observed flood event on East Fork White River near Seymour, Indiana (Seymour reach) and Strouds Creek in Orange County, North Carolina. Performance of GLUE is assessed by selecting three likelihood functions including the sum of absolute error (SAE) in water surface elevation and inundation width, sum of squared error (SSE) in water surface elevation and inundation width, and a statistic (F-statistic) on the basis of the area of observed and simulated flood inundation map. Results show that the uncertainty in topography, roughness and flow information created an uncertainty bound in the inundation area that ranged from 1.4 to 4.6% for Seymour reach and 4 to 29% for Strouds Creek of the base inundation areas. Additionally, flood inundation maps produced by applying GLUE have different uncertainty bounds depending on the selection of the likelihood functions. However, the overall difference in the flood inundation maps on the basis different likelihood functions is less than 2%, suggesting that the subjectivity involved in selecting the likelihood measure in GLUE did not create a significant effect on the overall uncertainty quantification in flood inundation mapping of the selected study areas.
机译:洪水淹没图的创建过程受到数据,建模方法,参数和地理处理工具的不确定性的影响。广义似然不确定性估计(GLUE)是一种流行的技术,用于通过蒙特卡洛分析和贝叶斯估计来表示模型预测中的不确定性。这项研究的目的是(1)使用蒙特卡洛模拟和GLUE比较洪水淹没制图中多个变量产生的不确定性,以及(2)研究主观选择GLUE可能性度量在洪水淹没制图中量化不确定性中的作用。研究了一维水文工程中心-河流分析系统(HEC-RAS)模型和洪水淹没图的流量,地形和粗糙度系数的作用,以观察西摩附近东叉白河的洪水事件,印第安纳州(西摩河段)和北卡罗来纳州奥兰治县的斯特劳兹溪。通过选择三个似然函数来评估GLUE的性能,这些函数包括水面高程和淹没宽度的绝对误差之和(SAE),水面高程和淹没宽度的平方误差之和(SSE)以及统计量(F统计)根据观测和模拟洪水淹没图的面积。结果表明,地形,粗糙度和流量信息的不确定性在淹没区造成了不确定性范围,对于西摩河段而言,不确定性范围为1.4%至4.6%,对于基本淹没区的斯特劳兹溪,不确定性范围为4%至29%。此外,根据似然函数的选择,通过应用GLUE生成的洪水淹没图具有不同的不确定性范围。但是,根据不同的似然函数,洪水淹没图的总体差异小于2%,这表明在GLUE中选择似然度量所涉及的主观性不会对洪水淹没图的总体不确定性量化产生重大影响。选定的学习领域。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号