...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of the History of Medicine and Allied Sciences >Transforming Sexuality: The Medical Sources of Karl Heinrich Ulrichs (1825–95) and the Origins of the Theory of Bisexuality
【24h】

Transforming Sexuality: The Medical Sources of Karl Heinrich Ulrichs (1825–95) and the Origins of the Theory of Bisexuality

机译:改变性欲:卡尔·海因里希·乌尔里希斯(Karl Heinrich Ulrichs,1825–95)的医学渊源和双性恋理论的起源

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

This article explores the medical references in the writings of the German jurist and activist Karl Heinrich Ulrichs as a means of breaking new ground in diverse fields (including history of medicine, history of sexuality, and gender history). It demonstrates that the theory of bisexuality has a much deeper and more textured genealogy than has been hitherto appreciated and that dual-gendered bodies and minds must be better recognized as important through the nineteenth century. Specifically, it demonstrates that classifications and rhetoric of hermaphroditism, and other dual-gendered categories (e.g., sexual dualism and anatomical bisexuality), were deployed in diverse contexts through the period, often with little or no reference to the occurrence of genital ambiguities. Important discourses in embryology, utilized by Ulrichs, suggested that all individuals, in the earliest stages of fetal development, were hermaphroditic. In making an analogy among the ontogeny of sex anatomy, hermaphroditism, and the development of erotic preferences, Ulrichs sought to naturalize homoeroticism, rendering social and legal prohibitions untenable. His advocacy, however, was counterbalanced by the Prussian forensic expert Johann Ludwig Casper who had made some conceptual maneuvers similar to Ulrichs only couched in the rhetoric of pathology. Ulrichs was equivocal in his use of forensic works such as Casper's, condemning their authors but recognizing similarities with his own gender schema.
机译:本文探讨了德国法学家和激进主义者卡尔·海因里希·乌尔里希斯(Karl Heinrich Ulrichs)著作中的医学参考文献,以此作为在各个领域(包括医学史,性史和性别史)开辟新天地的手段。它表明,双性恋理论具有比迄今所认识的更为深刻和丰富的家谱,并且在十九世纪,必须更好地认识到双性别的身心。具体而言,它表明雌雄同体生殖器官的分类和修辞以及其他双重性别类别(例如性二元论和解剖双性恋)在整个时期被部署在不同的背景下,通常很少或根本没有提到生殖器歧义的发生。乌尔里希斯(Ulrichs)利用的重要的胚胎学论述表明,在胎儿发育的最早阶段,所有个体都是雌雄同体的。在对性解剖学,雌雄同体和性爱偏好的发展进行类比时,乌尔里希斯试图使同性恋归化,使社会和法律禁令难以成立。然而,普鲁士法医专家约翰·路德维希·卡斯珀(Johann Ludwig Casper)抵消了他的主张,后者做了一些类似于乌尔里希斯(Ulrichs)的概念演习,只不过是在病理学上充斥。乌尔里希斯(Ulrichs)在使用诸如卡斯珀(Casper)之类的法医作品时模棱两可,谴责了他们的作者,但也认识到与自己的性别模式相似。

著录项

  • 来源
  • 作者

    Ross Brooks⇓;

  • 作者单位

    Centre for Health, Medicine and Society: Past and Present, Department of History, Oxford Brookes University, Headington Campus, Gipsy Lane, Oxford OX3 0BP, UK.;

  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号