首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Historical Geography >Richard Hartshorne's adaptation of Alfred Hettner's system of geography
【24h】

Richard Hartshorne's adaptation of Alfred Hettner's system of geography

机译:理查德·哈茨霍恩(Richard Hartshorne)对阿尔弗雷德·赫特纳(Alfred Hettner)的地理系统的改编

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Most geographers assume that the ideas of the German geographer Alfred Hettner (1859—1941) had a significant impact on Hartshorne's The Nature of Geography. In this article we consider Hartshorne's adaptation of Hettner's diverse and at times contradictory work in the context of both German and American geographies. We argue that Hartshorne adapted Hettner's system of geography for an American audience, without engaging with fundamental ideological and intellectual changes which took place in Germany following the First World War. Sharply distinguishing their work from that of their predecessors, German geographers in the 1920s and 1930s overwhelmingly rejected Hettner's approach. During this period, many embraced a holistic and organic concept of geography, which built on voelkisch and nationalistic ideologies. Yet rather than engaging with these debates in German geographical thought, Hartshorne simply adopted the interpretation of Hettner's work presented by his critics (Spethmann et al.). Motivated by the desire to cast geography in a neo-Kantian philosophical framework, ironically in opposition to Hettner's own philosophy of science, Hartshorne's adaptation of Hettner's system of geography is closer to the interpretations of his German critics. There were, we suggest, significant differences between the ideas of Hettner and Hartshorne on the place of geography among the sciences, the importance of nomothetic and idiographic approaches, the relationship between systematic and regional geography, and the understanding of landscape.
机译:大多数地理学家都认为德国地理学家阿尔弗雷德·赫特纳(Alfred Hettner,1859年-1941年)的思想对哈特索恩的《地理本质》产生了重大影响。在本文中,我们考虑了Hartshorne对Hettner多样化且有时在德国和美国地理环境中相互矛盾的工作的改编。我们认为,哈茨霍恩在没有引起第一次世界大战后德国发生的根本性思想和思想变革的情况下,为美国观众改编了赫特纳的地理系统。 1920年代和1930年代的德国地理学家将他们的作品与以前的作品区别开来,以压倒性多数拒绝了海特纳的做法。在此期间,许多人接受了基于voelkisch和民族主义意识形态的整体地理学概念。然而,哈茨霍恩并没有参与德国地理思想中的这些辩论,而只是采用了批评家提出的对海特纳作品的解释(Spethmann等人)。出于对在新康德哲学体系中投下地理学的渴望的鼓舞,具有讽刺意味的是,与赫特纳自己的科学哲学相反,哈兹霍恩对赫特纳的地理系统的改编更接近于他的德国评论家的解释。我们认为,赫特纳和哈茨霍恩在地理学上的观念之间在科学之间存在显着差异,而自然学和特殊方法的重要性,系统性和区域性地理之间的关系以及对景观的理解之间存在重大差异。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号