首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Historical Geography >John Shary, Charles Pease, and contested irrigation landscapes in early-twentieth-century South Texas
【24h】

John Shary, Charles Pease, and contested irrigation landscapes in early-twentieth-century South Texas

机译:约翰·沙里(John Shary),查尔斯·皮斯(Charles Pease)和20世纪初南德克萨斯州的灌溉景观竞赛

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

The paper contributes to notions of 'hybrid' historical geographies of irrigation by focusing on contested visions for irrigation in the Lower Rio Grande Valley of Texas. Adding to geographical work using biography, notions of performance, and racialized landscapes, the paper analyzes debates between John Shary and Charles Pease. Shary and Pease were protagonists, respectively, of pumping water from the Rio Grande and a gravity scheme reliant on action by the U.S. Bureau of Reclamation. The pumping system survived; the gravity system was never constructed. However, the debate between Shary and Pease illustrates tensions within the Anglo elite. The analysis focuses on three early-twentieth-century moments. The first is a 1918 crisis in Shary's irrigation company, followed by a 1927 debate between Shary and Pease over the flaws of the pumping system and benefits of gravity irrigation. Finally, the paper focuses on Shary and Pease's constructions of racialized landscapes that subordinated Hispanics as voters to be utilized for Shary's accumulation strategy, or as 'non-water users' that should be excluded from water politics. The paper argues that Shary and Pease projected similarly exclusionary social visions onto the irrigated landscape in spite of their differences on irrigation systems.
机译:通过关注德克萨斯州下里奥格兰德河谷的有争议的灌溉前景,本文为“混合型”灌溉历史地理学概念做出了贡献。除了使用传记,表演概念和种族化景观的地理工作外,本文还分析了约翰·沙里(John Shary)和查尔斯·皮斯(Charles Pease)之间的争论。 Shary和Pease分别是从里奥格兰德(Rio Grande)抽水和依靠美国垦殖局采取行动的重力计划的主角。抽水系统幸免;重力系统从未建造过。但是,莎莉和皮斯之间的争论说明了英美精英内部的紧张关系。分析着重于二十世纪初的三个时刻。首先是1918年Shary的灌溉公司发生危机,其次是Shary和Pease于1927年就抽水系统的缺陷和重力灌溉的好处进行了辩论。最后,本文重点讨论了Shary和Pease对种族化景观的构建,这些景观使拉美裔人从属于选民,用于Shary的积累策略,或者作为应被排除在水政治之外的“非水使用者”。该论文认为,尽管灌溉系统存在差异,但Shary和Pease将类似的排他性社会愿景投射到了灌溉景观上。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号