...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of health economics >Confirmatory bias in health decisions: Evidence from the MMR-autism controversy
【24h】

Confirmatory bias in health decisions: Evidence from the MMR-autism controversy

机译:卫生决策的确认偏见:来自MMR-AUT is的证据争议

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

Since Wakefield et al. (1998) the public was exposed to mixed information surrounding the claim that measles-mumps-rubella vaccine causes autism. A persistent trend to delay the vaccination during 1998-2011 in the US was driven by children of college-educated mothers, suggesting that these mothers held biases against the vaccine influenced by the early unfounded claim. Consistent with confirmatory bias, exposures to negative information about the vaccine strengthened their biases more than exposures to positive information attenuated them. Positive online information, however, had strong impacts on vaccination decisions, suggesting that online dissemination of vaccine-safety information may help tackle the sticky misinformation. (C) 2020 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
机译:自从韦克菲尔德等人以来。 (1998年)公众接触到围绕麻疹 - 腮腺炎 - 风疹疫苗引起自闭症的混合信息。持续趋势延迟美国1998 - 2011年在美国的疫苗接种的趋势是由大学教育的母亲的儿童驱动的,这表明这些母亲对受早期未根据未命除的索赔影响的疫苗保持偏见。与确认偏差一致,暴露于有关疫苗的否定信息加强其偏置,而不是曝光阳性信息衰减它们。然而,积极的在线信息对疫苗接种决策产生了强烈影响,这表明在线传播疫苗安全信息可能有助于解决粘性错误信息。 (c)2020 Elsevier B.v.保留所有权利。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号