首页> 外文期刊>The journal of hazmat transportation >The Journal of HazMat Transportation's™ Exclusive Comments on Current U.S. DOT Letters of Interpretation of the Hazardous Materials Regulations
【24h】

The Journal of HazMat Transportation's™ Exclusive Comments on Current U.S. DOT Letters of Interpretation of the Hazardous Materials Regulations

机译:《危险品运输杂志》对当前美国DOT危险材料法规解释信的独家评论

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

The incoming email asks PHMSA to reconsider two interpretation letters - 06-0129 and 07-0029. In 06-0129, when questioned on whether a packaging tested using 42mm tape needed to be treated as a "different packaging" when 72mm tape of the same type was used, PHMSA responded by saying that use of tape of greater width constituted a different design requiring separate testing. Interpretation 07-0029 denied reconsideration of the earlier interpretation letter. In that denial letter PHMSA also noted that no one could be absolutely sure that wider tape improved the integrity of the packaging. Although the regulation has not changed and the literal meaning of the regulatory text would seem to support the original PHMSA interpretation, PHMSA has rescinded the two earlier interpretations and apparently replaced them with this one interpretation letter bearing three reference numbers (17,0121, 07-0029R and 06-0029R). Let's look at what is behind this.
机译:收到的电子邮件要求PHMSA重新考虑两个解释字母-06-0129和07-0029。在06-0129中,当被问及在使用相同类型的72mm胶带时是否需要将使用42mm胶带测试的包装视为“不同包装”时,PHMSA回答说,使用更大宽度的胶带构成了不同的设计需要单独测试。解释07-0029拒绝重新考虑先前的解释信。 PHMSA在那封拒绝信中还指出,没有人可以绝对确定更宽的胶带可以改善包装的完整性。尽管法规没有改变,法规文本的字面意义似乎支持原始的PHMSA解释,但是PHMSA已撤销了之前的两种解释,并显然用具有三个参考数字的该解释字母代替了它们(17,0121,07- 0029R和06-0029R)。让我们看看背后的原因。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号