首页> 外文期刊>The journal of hazmat transportation >Classification Based on Human Experience.
【24h】

Classification Based on Human Experience.

机译:基于人类经验的分类。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Clearly, classification of substances on the basis of human experience poses problems in classifying solutions that contain them. The regulations are deficient in terms of how to address such classifications. Use of scientifically based human toxicity estimates in a mixture calculation method seems to be the most valid approach. The relief provided by the ADR and RID, which, in essence nullifies human experience classifications, would seem to put those importing into Europe at a competitive disadvantage to those manufacturing solutions of "human experience" substances in Europe. It would seem that this issue is ripe for revisiting at the UNSCETDG, particularly in relation to methanol. In the meantime, those faced with the issue could seek out scientifically valid "human experience" data such as that noted for methanol above and use it as a basis for calculating a classification, when authorized. Who could reasonably challenge such an approach?
机译:显然,根据人类经验对物质进行分类会给包含这些物质的溶液分类带来麻烦。该法规在如何处理此类分类方面是不足的。在混合物计算方法中使用基于科学依据的人类毒性估计值似乎是最有效的方法。 ADR和RID提供的救济实质上使人类经验分类无效,这似乎使那些进口到欧洲的人与那些在欧洲制造“人类经验”物质的解决方案处于竞争劣势。在UNSCETDG上重新审视这个问题似乎已经成熟,特别是在甲醇方面。同时,面临该问题的人员可以在科学上找到有效的“人类经验”数据,例如上面针对甲醇所述的数据,并在获得授权后将其用作计算分类的基础。谁能合理挑战这种方法?

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号