...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Hazardous Materials >A review of the criteria for people exposure to radiant heat flux from fires
【24h】

A review of the criteria for people exposure to radiant heat flux from fires

机译:审查人们暴露于火源辐射热通量的标准

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

The NFPA 59A Standard and the Federal Regulation, 49 CFR Part 193, stipulate a level of 5 kW/m~2 as the criterion for determining the hazard distance to people exposure from a LNG fire. Another regulation (24CFR, Section 51.204) while stipulating a lower exposure limit of 1.42 kW/m~2 provides administrative relief from the regulation if mitigation measures are provided. Several countries in Europe and the Far East have adopted both a specified heat flux value (generally, 5 kW/m~2) as well as modified dose criteria for human exposure hazard calculation in risk assessments. In some cases, the regulations in Europe require the use of lower values for children and physically challenged persons. This paper reviews the available literature on the phenomenon of skin burn caused by radiant heat exposure. The associated thermal and spectral properties of human skin are reviewed. The basis for regulatory setting, of 5 kW/m~2 and other exposure criteria (as a part of hazard and risk calculations) for evaluating distances to hazards from the exposure of people to radiant heat effects of large fires, is evaluated. An example calculation is provided to show the extent of reduction in the hazard distance to specified radiant heat flux from a fire when the spectral reflection and absorption properties of skin are considered with and without the inclusion of the mitigating effects of clothing. The results indicate that hazard distances calculated including the reflective and band absorptive properties (in IR wavelength) of skin results in a reduction of between 30 and 50% in the hazard distances obtained with current methodology, which ignores these effects. Unfortunately, there are no test results, from full-scale human-exposure-to-IR radiation, with which these predictions can be compared.
机译:NFPA 59A标准和联邦法规49 CFR第193部分规定5 kW / m〜2的水平作为确定距LNG火灾人员的危险距离的标准。另一法规(24CFR,第51.204节)规定了1.42 kW / m〜2的较低暴露极限,如果提供了缓解措施,则可以从该法规中获得行政救济。欧洲和远东的几个国家在风险评估中都采用了指定的热通量值(通常为5 kW / m〜2)以及修改的剂量标准来计算人体暴露危害。在某些情况下,欧洲法规要求为儿童和身体残障人士使用较低的价值。本文回顾了有关辐射热引起的皮肤灼伤现象的现有文献。审查了人类皮肤的相关热和光谱特性。评估了5kW / m〜2的法规设置的基础以及其他暴露标准(作为危害和风险计算的一部分),用于评估从人员暴露于大火的辐射热效应到危害的距离。提供了一个示例计算,以显示在考虑到皮肤的光谱反射和吸收特性(不包括衣服的缓解效果)的情况下,距火源到特定辐射热通量的危险距离减小的程度。结果表明,计算出的危险距离(包括皮肤的反射率和波段吸收特性(在IR波长中)导致使用当前方法获得的危险距离减少了30%至50%,而忽略了这些影响。不幸的是,没有从人体到红外线的全面辐射测试结果,可以与这些预测进行比较。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号