...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of great lakes research >Estimates of fishing and natural mortality rates for four Lake Whitefish stocks in Northern Lakes Huron and Michigan
【24h】

Estimates of fishing and natural mortality rates for four Lake Whitefish stocks in Northern Lakes Huron and Michigan

机译:北部休伦湖和密歇根州怀特菲什湖四种鱼类的捕捞和自然死亡率估算

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

We analyzed tag-recovery data to estimate instantaneous fishing (F) and natural mortality (M) rates of four lake whitefish stocks in lakes Michigan and Huron during 2004-2007. We tagged and released 22,452 adult lake whitefish of which 8.7% were subsequently recovered. Annual tag-reporting rates ranged from 17.8% to 56.2%. Tag retention was high for the first 5-6 months after tagging, but tag loss increased substantially thereafter. Nine tag-recovery models were evaluated with respect to whether F and/or M varied among stocks, lakes, or years. There was support for three models based on Akaike information criteria. The best model had yearly and stock-specific estimates of F of 0.03 to 0.79 and lake-specific estimates of M of 0.35 for Lake Michigan and 0.60 for Lake Huron. The second best model had yearly and stock-specific estimates of F of 0.04 to 0.71 and a constant estimate for M of 0.52. The third model had yearly and stock-specific estimates of F of 0.04 to 0.85 and stock-specific estimates of M of 0.32 to 0.67. Model-averaged estimates of F ranged from 0.04 to 0.78 and were substantially different than statistical catch-at-age estimates of F. Model-averaged estimates of M ranged from 0.40 to 0.59 and were greater than estimates obtained from prediction equations, possibly due to sea lamprey-induced mortality. We recommend that tag-recovery estimates of F and M be used as Bayesian priors in future lake whitefish stock assessments to help refine mortality estimates for the stocks.
机译:我们分析了标签回收数据,以估算2004-2007年密歇根湖和休伦湖四种白鲑种群的瞬时捕捞(F)和自然死亡率(M)比率。我们标记并发布了22,452个成年湖泊白鲑,其后回收了8.7%。年度标签报告率从17.8%到56.2%不等。标记后的前5-6个月,标记保留率很高,但此后标记损失显着增加。评估了九种标签回收模型,以评估F和/或M在种群,湖泊或年份之间是否变化。支持基于Akaike信息标准的三种模型。最好的模型对密歇根湖的年度和特定种群的F估计为0.03至0.79,对湖泊的M特定估计为0.35,对于休伦湖为0.60。第二好的模型的年度和股票特定F估计值为0.04到0.71,M的恒定估计值为0.52。第三个模型的F的年度和股票特定估计值为0.04至0.85,M的股票特定估计值为0.32至0.67。 F的模型平均估计值在0.04到0.78之间,与F的统计捕获估计值有很大不同。M的模型平均估计值在0.40到0.59之间,并且大于从预测方程式获得的估计值,这可能是由于海七lamp鳗引起的死亡率。我们建议将F和M的标签恢复估计值用作未来湖泊白鱼种群评估中的贝叶斯先验,以帮助完善种群的死亡率估计。

著录项

  • 来源
    《Journal of great lakes research》 |2010年第1期|P.110-120|共11页
  • 作者单位

    Inter-Tribal Fisheries and Assessment Program, Chippewa Ottawa Resource Authority, I79 W. Three Mile Rd., Sault Ste. Marie, Ml 49783, USA;

    Department of Fisheries and Wildlife, Quantitative Fisheries Center, Michigan State University, 153 Ciltner Hall, East Lansing, Ml 48824, USA;

    rnDepartment of Fisheries and Wildlife, Quantitative Fisheries Center, Michigan State University, 153 Ciltner Hall, East Lansing, Ml 48824, USA;

  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

    lake whitefish; mortality; tag-recovery models; sea lamprey;

    机译:怀特菲什湖死亡;标签回收模型;海南lamp;

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号