...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of great lakes research >An assessment of water quality in two Great Lakes connecting channels
【24h】

An assessment of water quality in two Great Lakes connecting channels

机译:对两个大湖连接渠道的水质评估

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

Compared to the Great Lakes, their connecting channels are relatively understudied and infrequently assessed. To address this gap, we conducted a spatially-explicit water quality assessment of two connecting channels, the St. Marys River and the Lake Huron-Lake Erie Corridor (HEC) in 2014-2016. We compared the condition of the channels to each other and to the up- and downriver Great Lakes with data from an assessment of the Great Lakes nearshore. In the absence of channel-specific thresholds, we assessed the condition of the area of each channel as good, fair, or poor by applying the most protective water quality thresholds for the downriver lake. Condition of the St. Marys River was rated mostly fair for total phosphorus (TP, 56% of the area) and mostly good (61% of the area) for chlorophyll a. Area-weighted mean concentrations of these parameters were intermediate to Lake Superior and Lake Huron. Unlike Lake Superior and Lake Huron, a large proportion (97%) of the area of the St. Marys River was in poor condition for water clarity based on Secchi depth. Area-weighted mean concentrations of TP and chlorophyll a in the HEC were more like lake Huron than Lake Erie. For these indicators, most of the area of the HEC was rated good (81% and 86%, respectively). Interpretation of assessment results is complicated by variation in thresholds among and within lakes. Appropriate thresholds should align with assessment objectives and in the case of connecting channels be at least as protective as thresholds for the downriver lake. (C) 2019 International Association for Great Lakes Research. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
机译:与五大湖相比,它们的连通渠道相对未被充分研究和评估。为了解决这一差距,我们在2014-2016年对两条连接通道圣玛丽斯河和休伦湖伊利走廊(HEC)进行了空间明晰的水质评估。我们通过对近岸五大湖地区的评估数据,将河道彼此之间以及大湖上下游的条件进行了比较。在没有特定于通道的阈值的情况下,我们通过对下游湖泊应用最具保护性的水质阈值,将每个通道区域的状况评估为好,一般或差。圣玛丽斯河的状况对总磷(总磷,占该地区的56%)的评价大多数是合理的,而对叶绿素a则对它的评价最高(该地区的61%)。这些参数的区域加权平均浓度介于苏必利尔湖和休伦湖之间。与苏必利尔湖和休伦湖不同,根据Secchi深度,圣玛丽斯河地区很大一部分地区(97%)的水质状况较差。 HEC中TP和叶绿素a的面积加权平均浓度更像休伦湖而不是伊利湖。对于这些指标,HEC的大部分区域被评为良好(分别为81%和86%)。湖泊之间和湖泊内部阈值的变化使评估结果的解释变得复杂。适当的阈值应与评估目标保持一致,在连接通道的情况下,至少应与下游湖泊的阈值具有同样的保护性。 (C)2019国际大湖研究协会。由Elsevier B.V.发布。保留所有权利。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号