首页> 外文期刊>Journal of geotechnical and geoenvironmental engineering >Closure to 'Assessing Overconsolidation Ratios in Soil with Piezocone: Referencing Soil Index Properties' by Steven R. Saye, Alan J. Lutenegger, Jorge Santos, and Bryan P. Kumm
【24h】

Closure to 'Assessing Overconsolidation Ratios in Soil with Piezocone: Referencing Soil Index Properties' by Steven R. Saye, Alan J. Lutenegger, Jorge Santos, and Bryan P. Kumm

机译:Steven R. Saye,Alan J. Lutenegger,Jorge Santos和Bryan P. Kumm撰写的“用压电陶瓷来评估土壤中的超固结比率:参考土壤指数特性”

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

The writers would like to thank the discusser for his insightful comments regarding the paper. As the discusser pointed out, the approach presented in the paper by the writers is a total stress approach whereas the approach presented by the discusser in the numerous publications cited is an effective stress approach. As might be expected, both approaches will essentially lead to similar results if properly used with reference testing. The writers' approach requires only basic soil characteristics, which practitioners can easily obtain, whereas the approach presented by the discusser and his colleagues requires the determination, or at least an estimation, of a number of soil properties, many of which are not necessarily easy to obtain by practicing engineers. The paper cited by the discusser was not available to the writers at the time of preparation of the paper, and it may be of some value to consider this review. As previously reported, the cone penetration test (CPT) material index, I_c, may be useful in helping to refine empirical correlations using CPT results and it may be that for saturated fine-grained soils, I_c may embody the subtle differences in behavior resulting from differences in composition, plasticity, and consistency. Further correlation data in highly plastic clays and organic soils over a range of overconsolidation ratio values are merited to extend the discusser's approach where the writers identify high exponent m_(CPTu) values. The use of basic soil characterization parameters, such as plasticity index and liquid limit, in differentiating soil behavior from both a total stress and effective stress approach has been a part of geotechnical practice and research for the last 60 years and is a simple, expedient approach that provides both an alternative and a confirmation to other more intricate approaches described by the discusser.
机译:作者要感谢讨论者对论文的深刻见解。正如讨论者所指出的,作者在论文中提出的方法是一种总压力方法,而讨论者在所引用的众多出版物中提出的方法是一种有效的压力方法。可以预期的是,如果将这些方法正确地与参考测试结合使用,则两种方法都会产生相似的结果。作者的方法仅要求基本的土壤特性,而从业人员可以轻松获得这些特性,而讨论者和他的同事提出的方法则需要确定或至少估算一些土壤特性,其中许多不一定容易通过实践工程师获得。在撰写本文时,讨论者引用的论文尚未提供给作者,因此考虑此评论可能具有某些价值。如先前报道的那样,锥入度测试(CPT)材料索引I_c可能有助于使用CPT结果来改善经验相关性,并且可能对于饱和的细颗粒土壤,I_c可能体现了由成分,可塑性和一致性方面的差异。在一些超固结比值范围内的高塑性粘土和有机土壤中,还需要进一步的相关性数据,以扩展讨论者的方法,作者可以确定出高指数的m_(CPTu)值。在过去的60年中,使用基本的土壤表征参数(例如可塑性指数和液体极限)来区分土壤行为与总应力和有效应力方法已成为岩土工程实践和研究的一部分,这是一种简单,方便的方法它为讨论者描述的其他更复杂的方法提供了替代方法和一种确认。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号