...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of geotechnical and geoenvironmental engineering >Deterministic and probabilistic assessment of liquefaction hazards using the liquefaction potential index and liquefaction reduction number
【24h】

Deterministic and probabilistic assessment of liquefaction hazards using the liquefaction potential index and liquefaction reduction number

机译:使用液化潜力指数和液化减少量对液化危害进行确定性和概率评估

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

The liquefaction potential index (LPI) has increasingly been used for assessing liquefaction hazards induced by earthquake shaking. The LPI allows an integral number of soil horizons to be evaluated for liquefaction potential. Considerable uncertainty exists in cases where the LPI thresholds for classifying liquefaction hazards statistically rely on the data sets and/or the framework. This study explored what the appropriate LPI classification thresholds should be and developed a liquefaction reduction number (R_L) to better account for the impact of nonliquefiable layers. The LPI and R_L values were then analyzed at the standard penetration test (SPT) data sites reported in case studies. The results suggested that most SPT-based LPI thresholds should be modified upward in comparison with Iwasaki's original scale. These corrections are of particular importance when clay minerals are part of the soil mixture, rather than simply using the minus 200-sieve fraction as the liquefaction susceptibility criterion. Nonliquefied sites appear to exhibit higher R_L values, suggesting that the R_L could supplement the LPI as a valuable proxy for liquefaction hazard assessments. Probabilistic liquefaction hazard assessments could be estimated using a logistic regression of the LPI and/or R_L values.
机译:液化潜力指数(LPI)已越来越多地用于评估地震震动引起的液化危害。 LPI允许评估一定数量的土壤层的液化潜力。在用于液化危害分类的LPI阈值统计上依赖于数据集和/或框架的情况下,存在很大的不确定性。这项研究探讨了适当的LPI分类阈值应为多少,并制定了液化减少数(R_L)以更好地说明非液化层的影响。然后,在案例研究中报告的标准渗透测试(SPT)数据站点中分析LPI和R_L值。结果表明,与Iwasaki的原始量表相比,大多数基于SPT的LPI阈值应向上修改。当粘土矿物是土壤混合物的一部分时,这些校正特别重要,而不是简单地使用负200筛分作为液化敏感性标准。非液化站点似乎具有较高的R_L值,表明R_L可以补充LPI,作为液化危害评估的有价值的代理。可以使用LPI和/或R_L值的逻辑回归来估计概率性液化危害评估。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号