首页> 外文期刊>Journal of geographical sciences >A comparison between different ecological de-farming modes in the loess hilly-gully region in China
【24h】

A comparison between different ecological de-farming modes in the loess hilly-gully region in China

机译:黄土丘陵区不同生态耕作模式的比较。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

The eco-environmental restoration has been a chief task of the western development strategies carried out by the central and local governments of China since the late 1990s, and the ecological de-farming has been regarded as a powerful measure for the ecological restoration in the Loess Plateau and the upper reaches of the Yangtze River. "Relieving and de-farming" (RD) and "rebuilding terrace and de-farming" (RTD) are two more mature ones among various de-farming modes. Taking the loess hilly-gully region as a case, this paper summarized the basic characteristics of RD and RTD modes, calculated the sizes of de-farming slope farmland, rebuilt terraces, enlarged garden plots and restored vegetation, and compared the differences of two modes in terms of de-farming area, ecological reestablishment index, investment demand amount and benefits. The results showed that RTD mode has many advantages, including suitable investment, sufficient grain supply and great benefits, and will be the best ecological reestablishment mode in the loess hilly-gully region, and RD mode which is being carried out in this region should be replaced by RTD mode as soon as possible.
机译:自1990年代后期以来,生态环境恢复一直是中国中央和地方政府实施的西部大开发战略的主要任务,生态耕种已被视为黄土生态恢复的有力措施。高原和长江上游。在各种除耕模式中,“解除和除田”(RD)和“重建梯田和除田”(RTD)是两个比较成熟的方案。以黄土丘陵沟壑区为例,总结了RD和RTD模式的基本特征,计算了退耕坡耕地面积,梯田重建,花园面积扩大和植被恢复,并比较了两种模式的差异。在耕地面积,生态恢复指数,投资需求量和收益方面。结果表明,RTD模式具有投资适宜,粮食供应充足,效益显着等诸多优点,将成为黄土丘陵沟壑区最佳生态重建模式,应在该区域实施RD模式。尽快被RTD模式取代。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号