首页> 外文期刊>Journal of General Physiology >Structural Determinants of the Closed KCa3.1 Channel Pore in Relation to Channel Gating: Results from a Substituted Cysteine Accessibility Analysis
【24h】

Structural Determinants of the Closed KCa3.1 Channel Pore in Relation to Channel Gating: Results from a Substituted Cysteine Accessibility Analysis

机译:与通道门控有关的闭合KCa3.1通道孔的结构决定因素:替代半胱氨酸可及性分析的结果

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

In this work we address the question of the KCa3.1 channel pore structure in the closed configuration in relation to the contribution of the C-terminal end of the S6 segments to the Ca~(2+)-dependent gating process. Our results based on SCAM (substituted cysteine accessibility method) experiments first demonstrate that the S6 transmem-brane segment of the open KCa3.1 channel contains two distinct functional domains delimited by V282 with MTSEA and MTSET binding leading to a total channel inhibition at positions V275, T278, and V282 and to a steep channel activation at positions A283 and A286. The rates of modification by MTSEA (diameter 4.6 A) of the 275C (central cavity) and 286C residues (S6 C-terminal end) for the closed channel configuration were found to differ by less than sevenfold, whereas experiments performed with the larger MTSET reagent (diameter 5.8 A) resulted in modification rates 10~3-10~4 faster for cysteines at 286 compared with 275. Consistent with these results, the modification rates of the cavity lining 275C residue by MTSEA, Et-Hg~+, and Ag~+ appeared poorly state dependent, whereas modification rates by MTSET were 10~3 faster for the open than the closed configuration. A SCAM analysis of the channel inner vestibule in the closed state revealed in addition that cysteine residues at 286 were accessible to MTS reagents as large as MTS-PtrEA, a result supported by the observation that binding of MTSET to cysteines at positions 283 or 286 could neither sterically nor electrostatically block the access of MTSEA to the closed channel cavity (275C). It follows that the closed KCa3.1 structure can hardly be accountable by an inverted teepee-like structure as described for KcsA, but is better represented by a narrow passage centered at V282 (equivalent to V474 in Shaker) connecting the channel central cavity to the cytosolic medium. This passage would not be however restrictive to the diffusion of small reagents such as MTSEA, Et-Hg~+, and Ag~+, arguing against the C-terminal end of S6 forming an obstructive barrier to the diffusion of K~+ ions for the closed channel configuration.
机译:在这项工作中,我们解决了与S6片段的C末端对Ca〜(2+)依赖性门控过程的贡献有关的,处于闭合配置的KCa3.1通道孔结构的问题。我们基于SCAM(取代的半胱氨酸可及性方法)实验的结果首先证明,开放的CaCa3.1通道的S6跨膜片段包含两个不同的功能域,这些域由V282限定,并带有MTSEA和MTSET结合,导致在V275处的总通道被抑制,T278和V282,并激活位置A283和A286的陡峭通道。发现MTSEA(直径4.6 A)对封闭通道构型的275C(中心腔)和286C残基(S6 C末端)的修饰率相差不到七倍,而使用较大的MTSET试剂进行的实验(直径5.8 A)导致半胱氨酸在286时的修饰速率比275快10〜3-10〜4。与这些结果一致的是,MTSEA,Et-Hg〜+和Ag对腔壁275C残留物的修饰速率〜+似乎对状态的依赖性较差,而MTSET的修饰率在闭合状态下要快10〜3个。对封闭状态下通道内前庭的SCAM分析表明,除了MTS-PtrEA以外,MTS试剂还可以接近286位的半胱氨酸残基,这一结果得到了以下观察结果的支持:MTSET与283位或286位半胱氨酸的结合可以在空间上和静电上都没有阻止MTSEA进入封闭通道腔(275C)。由此得出结论,闭合的KCa3.1结构几乎不能像针对KcsA所述的倒圆锥形帐篷结构那样负责,但可以更好地用以V282为中心的狭窄通道(相当于Shaker中的V474)来表示,该通道将通道中心腔连接到通道。胞质培养基。但是,这种通过并不会限制诸如MTSEA,Et-Hg〜+和Ag〜+之类的小试剂的扩散,认为S6的C末端对K +离子的扩散形成了阻碍性屏障。封闭通道配置。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号