首页> 外文期刊>Journal of food protection >Comparison of Conventional Culture Method and Fluorescent In Situ Hybridization Technique for Detection of Listeria spp. in Ground Beef, Turkey, and Chicken Breast Fillets in izmir, Turkey
【24h】

Comparison of Conventional Culture Method and Fluorescent In Situ Hybridization Technique for Detection of Listeria spp. in Ground Beef, Turkey, and Chicken Breast Fillets in izmir, Turkey

机译:传统培养方法与荧光原位杂交技术检测李斯特菌的比较土耳其碎牛肉和土耳其伊兹密尔的鸡胸肉

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

The occurrence of Listeria species in refrigerated fresh chicken breast fillet, turkey breast fillet, and ground beef was evaluated, comparing the conventional culture method and fluorescent in situ hybridization (FISH). FISH uses hybridization of a nucleic acid sequence target of a microorganism with a specific DNA probe labeled with a fluorochrome and imaging by a fluorescence microscope. First, Listeria was inoculated in chicken breast fillet, turkey breast fillet, or ground beef, and the applicability of the FISH method was evaluated. Second, Listeria was detected in fresh chicken breast fillet, turkey breast fillet, and ground beef by culture and FISH methods. Listeria was isolated from 27 (37.4%) of 216 samples by the standard culture method, whereas FISH detected 25 (24.7%) preenriched samples. Of these isolates, 17 (63%) were L. innocua, 6 (22%) L. welshimeri, and 4 (14.8%) L. seeligeri. Overall, the prevalences of Listeria spp. found with the conventional culture method in chicken breast fillet, turkey breast fillet, and ground beef were 9.7, 6.9, and 20.8%, whereas with the FISH technique these values were 11.1, 6.9, and 16.7%, respectively. The molecular FISH technique appears to be a cheap, sensitive, and time-efficient procedure that could be used for routine detection of Listeria spp. in meat. This study showed that retail raw meats are potentially contaminated with Listeria spp. and are, thus, vehicles for transmitting diseases caused by foodborne pathogens, underlining the need for increased precautions, such as implementation of hazard analysis and critical control points and consumer food safety education.
机译:通过比较传统的培养方法和荧光原位杂交(FISH),评估了冷藏鲜鸡胸肉片,火鸡胸肉片和碎牛肉中李斯特菌的种类。 FISH使用微生物的核酸序列靶标与用荧光染料标记的特定DNA探针杂交并通过荧光显微镜成像。首先,在鸡胸肉,火鸡胸肉或碎牛肉中接种李斯特菌,并评估FISH方法的适用性。其次,通过培养和FISH方法在新鲜的鸡胸肉片,火鸡胸肉片和碎牛肉中检测到李斯特菌。通过标准培养方法从216个样品中的27个(37.4%)中分离出李斯特菌,而FISH检测到25个(24.7%)的预富集样品。在这些分离株中,有17株(63%)是无毒李斯特菌,6株(22%)welshimeri和4株(14.8%)L. seeligeri。总体而言,李斯特菌属的流行。用常规培养方法测得的鸡胸肉片,火鸡胸肉片和碎牛肉分别为9.7%,6.9%和20.8%,而采用FISH技术时,这些值分别为11.1、6.9和16.7%。分子FISH技术似乎是一种便宜,灵敏且省时的方法,可用于李斯特菌属的常规检测。在肉上。这项研究表明,零售生肉可能被李斯特菌污染。因此,它们是传播由食源性病原体引起的疾病的工具,强调需要采取更多的预防措施,例如实施危害分析和关键控制点以及进行消费者食品安全教育。

著录项

  • 来源
    《Journal of food protection》 |2014年第12期|2021-2030|共10页
  • 作者

    AYSE HANDAN BAYSAL;

  • 作者单位

    Izmir Institute of Technology, Department of Food Engineering, 035430 Urla, Izmir, Turkey;

  • 收录信息 美国《科学引文索引》(SCI);美国《化学文摘》(CA);
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

  • 入库时间 2022-08-17 23:25:18

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号