首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology >Interspecific and intraspecific interactions between fiddler crabs Minuca pugnax (mud fiddler) and Leptuca pugilator (sand fiddler) influence species' burrowing behavior
【24h】

Interspecific and intraspecific interactions between fiddler crabs Minuca pugnax (mud fiddler) and Leptuca pugilator (sand fiddler) influence species' burrowing behavior

机译:提琴蟹Minuca pugnax(泥提琴手)和Leptuca pugilator(沙提琴手)之间的种间和种内相互作用影响物种的穴居行为

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Species occupying similar habitat and functional niches will necessarily have some external force driving differentiation between them, thus creating complementarity, or otherwise face high competition for resources. In order to fully understand the role of each species in an ecosystem and their contributions to ecosystem function, it is important to understand the nature of these interactions. However, for species that occur in the same spatial niche and appear to occupy redundant functional niches, it is often difficult to distinguish between complementarity and redundancy and therefore to designate the functional role each species plays. We used two cooccurring fiddler crab species that are presumed to be functionally similar, Leptuca pugilator (sand fiddler crab) and Minuca pugnax (mud fiddler crab), to explore how species interactions may influence burrowing behavior. We ran manipulative mesocosm experiments to assess potential effects of species interactions on the number and location of burrows as well as the burrowing behavior of the crabs. Overall, sand fiddler crabs dug more burrows on average than mud fiddlers across all experiments while mud fiddlers were choosier about the location and sediment type of their burrows, suggesting complementarity in burrowing between the two species. Burrow counts in heterospecific treatments suggest that neither species interfered with nor enhanced burrow creation by the other species. However, increased burrow occupancy by mud fiddlers in the presence of sand fiddlers and aggressive behavior by mud fiddlers toward sand fiddlers suggest that mud fiddler crabs may receive refuge benefits from sand fiddler crabs through antagonistic rather than facilitative interactions. Thus, species-specific habitat use and interspecific interactions are likely influencing the role each species plays as a burrower and marsh ecosystem engineer.
机译:占据相似栖息地和功能生态位的物种必定会有某种外在动力驱使它们之间的分化,从而产生互补性,否则将面临资源的激烈竞争。为了充分了解每个物种在生态系统中的作用及其对生态系统功能的贡献,重要的是了解这些相互作用的性质。但是,对于出现在相同空间生态位中并似乎占据冗余功能生态位的物种,通常很难区分互补性和冗余性,因此很难确定每种物种所发挥的功能作用。我们使用了两种在功能上相似的同时出现的提琴蟹物种,即Leptuca pugilator(沙提琴蟹)和Minuca pugnax(泥提琴蟹),以研究物种相互作用如何影响穴居行为。我们进行了操纵性介观试验,以评估物种相互作用对洞穴的数量和位置以及螃蟹的洞穴行为的潜在影响。总体而言,在所有实验中,沙提琴蟹平均挖出的比挖泥蟹多的挖洞,而泥沙提琴者对它们的挖洞位置和沉积物类型的选择较为挑剔,表明这两个物种的挖洞是互补的。异种处理中的穴居计数表明,任何一种都不会干扰其他物种,也不会增加其他物种的穴居创造。但是,在有沙子提琴手的情况下,泥泞提琴手的洞穴占有率增加,并且泥泞提琴手对沙子提琴手的侵略行为表明,泥泞提琴手蟹可能会通过拮抗而不是促进相互作用而从沙子提琴手蟹中获得庇护。因此,特定物种的栖息地使用和种间相互作用可能会影响每个物种作为洞穴和沼泽生态系统工程师所扮演的角色。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号