首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology >Cost-benefit of different methods for monitoring invasive corals on tropical rocky reefs in the southwest Atlantic
【24h】

Cost-benefit of different methods for monitoring invasive corals on tropical rocky reefs in the southwest Atlantic

机译:监测西南大西洋热带礁石上侵入性珊瑚的不同方法的成本效益

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Biological invasions need to be efficiently monitored in order to detect change in invader abundance and the modification of receptor communities so that management options can be effectively applied. We compared four methods, visual census (VC), photo-quadrats of 50 x 50 cm (PHOT50), mosaic of photo-quadrats of 25 × 25 cm (PHOTS25) and video-quadrats (VIDEO), to determine 1) the percent cover of the most abundant taxa in reef communities undergoing invasion by the corals Tubastraea coccinea and Tubastraea tagusensis and 2) direct counts of the invasive species for density estimates per unit area. The study was carried out on eight islands in the Tamoios Ecological Station Marine Protected Area, llha Grande Bay, Brazil. The digital methods did not differentiate some T. coccinea from T. tagusensis and both Tubastraea densities were higher in the VC method, followed by PHOTS25, PHOT50 and VIDEO. An ANOSIM indicated differences among sampled communities but not between the methodologies. The richness, diversity and evenness indices did not differ significantly between the methods for the different benthic communities investigated. In the field, the VC was slower and PHOT50 was faster; however, in the laboratory VC was faster and PHOTS25 was slower. Overall the VC method was quickest, followed by PHOT50, VIDEO and PHOTS25. The overall cost was highest in PHOTS25 method, followed by the VC, VIDEO and PHOT50. VC had the best cost-to-benefit ratio and digital methods were not reliable for estimating the densities of corals.
机译:为了检测入侵者数量的变化和受体群落的改变,需要有效地监测生物入侵,以便可以有效地应用管理选择。我们比较了四种方法:视觉普查(VC),50 x 50厘米的照片四边形(PHOT50),25×25厘米的照片四边形(PHOTS25)和视频四边形(VIDEO),以确定1)百分比受到珊瑚Tubastraea coccinea和Tubastraea tagusensis入侵的珊瑚礁群落中最丰富的分类单元的覆盖范围,以及2)单位面积密度估算的入侵物种的直接计数。该研究是在巴西伊利亚格兰德湾的Tamoios生态站海洋保护区的八个岛屿上进行的。数字方法没有区分塔氏锥虫和塔氏锥虫,VC法中的大黄密度均较高,其次是PHOTS25,PHOT50和VIDEO。 ANOSIM指出抽样社区之间的差异,但方法论之间没有差异。不同底栖动物群落的方法之间的丰富度,多样性和均匀度指数没有显着差异。在现场,VC较慢,PHOT50较快。但是,在实验室中,VC更快,而PHOTS25则更慢。总体而言,VC方法最快,其次是PHOT50,VIDEO和PHOTS25。 PHOTS25方法的总成本最高,其次是VC,VIDEO和PHOT50。 VC具有最佳的成本效益比,而数字方法不能可靠地估计珊瑚的密度。

著录项

  • 来源
  • 作者单位

    Programa de Pos-GraduacSo em Ecologia e Evolucao, Instituto de Biologia Roberto Alcantara Gomes, Universidade do Estado do Rio deJaneiro - UERJ, Rio deJaneiro, RJ 20559-900, Brazil;

    Departamento de Ecologia, Instituto de Biologia Roberto Alcantara Gomes, Universidade do Estado do Rio de Janeiro, Rua Francisco Xavier 524, PHLC sala 220, Rio de Janeiro, RJ 20559-900, Brazil;

    Departamento de Zoologia, Instituto de Biologia, Universidade Federal da Bahia, Salvador, BA 40170-290, Brazil;

    Departamento de Ecologia, Instituto de Biologia Roberto Alcantara Gomes, Universidade do Estado do Rio de Janeiro, Rua Francisco Xavier 524, PHLC sala 220, Rio de Janeiro, RJ 20559-900, Brazil;

  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

    Benthos; Coral; Invasive species; Sampling techniques; Tubastraea spp;

    机译:Benthos;珊瑚;入侵物种;采样技术;大叶杜鹃;

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号