...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology >Does wave exposure determine the interactive effects of losing key grazers and ecosystem engineers?
【24h】

Does wave exposure determine the interactive effects of losing key grazers and ecosystem engineers?

机译:暴露在海浪中是否能确定失去重要放牧者和生态系统工程师的互动影响?

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

The consequences of biodiversity loss in the face of environmental change remain difficult to predict, given the complexity of interactions among species and the context-dependency of their functional roles within ecosystems. Predictions may be enhanced by studies testing how the interactive effects of species loss from different functional groups vary with important environmental drivers. On rocky shores, limpets and barnacles are recognised as key grazers and ecosystem engineers, respectively. Despite the large body of research examining the combined effects of limpet and barnacle removal, it is unclear how their relative importance varies according to wave exposure, which is a dominant force structuring intertidal communities. We tested the responses of algal communities to the removal of limpets and barnacles on three sheltered and three wave-exposed rocky shores on the north coast of Ireland. Limpet removal resulted in a relative increase in microalgal biomass on a single sheltered shore only, but led to the enhanced accumulation of ephemeral macroalgae on two sheltered shores and one exposed shore. On average, independently of wave exposure or shore, ephemeral macroalgae increased in response to limpet removal, but only when barnacles were removed. On two sheltered shores and one exposed shore, however, barnacles facilitated the establishment of fucoid macroalgae following limpet removal. Therefore, at the scale of this study, variability among individual shores was more important than wave exposure per se in determining the effect of limpet removal and its interaction with that of barnacles. Overall, these findings demonstrate that the interactive effects of losing key species from different functional groups may not vary predictably according to dominant environmental factors.
机译:鉴于物种之间相互作用的复杂性及其在生态系统中功能作用的背景依赖性,面对环境变化的生物多样性丧失的后果仍然难以预测。通过研究测试不同功能群的物种损失的互动影响如何随重要的环境驱动因素而变化的研究可以增强预测。在多岩石的海岸上,帽贝和藤壶分别被认为是主要的放牧者和生态系统工程师。尽管进行了大量研究,研究了去除帽贝和藤壶的综合效果,但尚不清楚它们的相对重要性如何随波浪暴露而变化,而波浪暴露是构成潮间带群落的主要力量。我们测试了藻类群落对爱尔兰北海岸三个避风塘和三个波浪曝露的岩石海岸上的帽贝和藤壶去除的反应。去除m毛仅导致单个庇护性海岸上微藻生物量的相对增加,但导致临时性大型藻类在两个庇护性海岸和一个裸露海岸上的积累增加。平均而言,短暂的大型藻类响应于去除帽贝而增加,但仅在去除藤壶的情况下,与波浪暴露或海岸无关。然而,在两个有遮盖的海岸和一个裸露的海岸上,藤壶在去除帽贝后促进了岩藻类巨藻的建立。因此,在本研究的范围内,在确定帽贝去除效果及其与藤壶的相互作用方面,各个海岸之间的变异性本身比波浪暴露本身更为重要。总体而言,这些发现表明,根据主要环境因素,失去来自不同功能组的关键物种的相互作用可能无法预测。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号