首页> 外文期刊>Journal of evolutionary economics >Evolutionary economics and the case for a constitutional libertarian paternalism-a comment on Martin Binder, 'should evolutionary economists embrace libertarian paternalism?'
【24h】

Evolutionary economics and the case for a constitutional libertarian paternalism-a comment on Martin Binder, 'should evolutionary economists embrace libertarian paternalism?'

机译:进化经济学和立宪的自由主义家长制的理由-评论马丁·宾德(Martin Binder),“进化经济学家应该接受自由主义者的家长制吗?”

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

In his article "Should evolutionary economists embrace libertarian paternalism?"(Journal of Evolutionary Economics 24(3), 2014, 515-539) Martin Binder discusses the pros and cons of "libertarian paternalism" (LP) from an explicitly evolutionary viewpoint, concluding that as a general rule, evolutionary economists should be cautious regarding this new and highly influential policy approach. In this comment I argue that Binder starts from an incomplete model of the institutional status quo and neglects an obvious alternative to the standard variant of LP, namely, a constitutionally constrained LP. Most of Binder's objections do not apply with equal force to such a refined variant of LP.
机译:马丁·宾德(Martin Binder)在他的文章“进化经济学家应该接受自由主义者的家长式主义吗?”(进化经济学期刊24(3),2014,515-539)中,从明确的进化论角度讨论了“自由主义者的家长式主义”(LP)的利弊。一般而言,进化经济学家应谨慎对待这种新的,极具影响力的政策方法。在这篇评论中,我认为Binder从制度现状的不完整模型开始,而忽略了LP标准变体的明显替代方案,即宪法约束的LP。宾德(Binder)的大多数异议都不适用于LP的这种改进变体。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号