首页> 外文期刊>Journal of European Integration >Turning Out or Turning Off: Do Mobilization and Attitudes Account for Turnout Differences between New and Established Member States at the 2004 EP Elections?
【24h】

Turning Out or Turning Off: Do Mobilization and Attitudes Account for Turnout Differences between New and Established Member States at the 2004 EP Elections?

机译:投票还是不投票:动员和态度是否解决了2004年欧洲议会选举中新成员国与老成员国之间的投票率差异?

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

How can we understand the low turnout seen in the 2004 European Parliament elections? One possibility would be that new member states were 'just different' either because of the post-communist legacy in some of them or because of an unexplicated 'low propensity to vote' in some of those. This article explicates the low propensity to vote in some post-communist countries by means of a general model of turnout that applies also to established EU member states. In this model low turnout is accounted for by party loyalties on the one hand, and affective and instrumental reasons for voting on the other. The latter factors are found to be lacking in European Parliament elections, which can nevertheless see high turnout due to party loyalty or compulsory voting. Where both of these are absent we see particularly low turnout, as we did in five of the new member countries in 2004.
机译:我们如何理解2004年欧洲议会选举中的投票率偏低?一种可能是新成员国“有些不同”,要么是由于其中一些拥有后共产主义的遗产,要么是因为其中有些没有明确的“低投票倾向”。本文通过一般投票率模型(也适用于已建立的欧盟成员国),阐明了一些后共产主义国家的投票倾向较低。在此模型中,投票率偏低一方面是由政党的忠诚度造成的,另一方面是由情感和工具性的投票原因造成的。欧洲议会选举中缺乏后一种因素,但是由于政党忠诚或强制投票,投票率很高。在这两个都不存在的地方,我们看到的投票率特别低,就像2004年在五个新成员国中所做的那样。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号