首页> 外文期刊>Journal of European Competition Law & Practice >Unwired Planet v Huawei, Conversant v Huawei & ZTE: UK Supreme Court confirms Global FRAND licensing
【24h】

Unwired Planet v Huawei, Conversant v Huawei & ZTE: UK Supreme Court confirms Global FRAND licensing

机译:无助的行星v华为,蜂熟v华为&中兴:英国最高法院确认全球丑闻许可

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

1. The UK Supreme Court upheld the decision of the Court of Appeal in both Unwired Planet v Huawei and Conversant v Huawei & ZTE.2. The Supreme Court confirmed that English courts have jurisdiction to set the terms of a global fair, reasonable, and non-discriminatory (FRAND) licence and grant an injunction preventing further infringement of UK standard essential patents if an imple-menter does not accept those terms.3. The Supreme Court also confirmed that the 'non-discrimination' limb of the FRAND obligation does not prevent SEP holders from offering lower rates to some licensees and that failure to follow the negotiation framework established in Huawei v ZTE will not automatically result in an abuse of dominance finding.4. The Supreme Court's findings mean that the English courts remain a favourable jurisdiction to resolve global FRAND disputes, although it remains to be seen whether other courts will be similarly willing to settle global terms.
机译:1.英国最高法院维持了在无助的行星V华为和谈话v华为和中兴的上诉法院的决定。2.最高法院证实,英国法院有管辖权,以确定全球公平,合理和非歧视性(FRAND)牌照的条款,并授予禁止侵犯英国标准必需专利的禁令,如果不接受意外导师这些条款。最高法院还证实,“不歧视”肢体的法令义务并不能阻止SEP持有人向一些被许可人提供较低的税率,并且未能遵循华为V中兴的谈判框架不会自动导致滥用优势发现。4.最高法院的调查结果意味着英国法院仍然是解决全球丑闻纠纷的有利管辖权,尽管其他法院是否相似愿意解决全球条款仍有待观察。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号