首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Epidemiology & Community Health >Short term effects of air pollution on emergency hospital admissions for respiratory disease: results of the APHEA project in two major cities in The Netherlands, 1977-89
【24h】

Short term effects of air pollution on emergency hospital admissions for respiratory disease: results of the APHEA project in two major cities in The Netherlands, 1977-89

机译:空气污染对呼吸系统疾病急诊住院的短期影响:1977-89年荷兰两个主要城市的APHEA项目结果

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Study objective - To assess the short term relationship between air pollution and the daily number of emergency hospital admissions for respiratory disease. Design — Data were analysed using auto-regressive Poisson regression allowing for overdispersion and controlling for possible confounding factors such as seasonal and other chronological variables, meteorological factors, and influenza epidemics. Setting - The two major cities in The Netherlands - Amsterdam (694 700 inhabitants) and Rotterdam (576200 inhabitants). Participants and measurements — Emergency hospital admissions for respiratory diseases, registered on a daily basis by the National Medical Registration, for the period 1977-89 were used. ICD-9 codes included were: respiratory (460-519), chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (490-492, 494, 496), and asthma (493). The mean (range) of the total daily number of admissions for these three classifications were as follows: 6.70 (0-23), 1.74 (0-9) and 1.13 (0-7) respectively in Amsterdam and 4.79 (0-19), 1.57 (0-9), and 0.53 (0-5) in Rotterdam. Air pollution measurements were provided by the National Institute of Public Health and Environmental Protection. In The Netherlands, air pollution is at a low to moderate ("summer type") or a low ("winter type") level. The levels in Amsterdam and Rotterdam did not differ much for the "summer type". For 1977-89 the mean (range) values of ozone (O_3), the "summer type" pollutant (O_3-8h), were 86 (0-252) μg/m~3 in Amsterdam and 82 (0-286) μg/m~3 in Rotterdam. The mean (range) of the values "winter type", pollutant, sulphur dioxide (SO_2-24h), were 38 (0-381) μg/m~3 in Amsterdam and 50 (1-379) μg/m~3 in Rotterdam. For black smoke (BS-24h), values were 14 (1-84) μg/m~3 and 28 (1-144) μg/m~3 respectively (1986-89). Main results - Ozone had a non-significant positive effect on the number of respiratory emergency admissions in summer in people aged ≥ 65 years (relative risk for a 100 μg/m~3 increase in O_3-8h of 1.127 (0.983, 1.292) in Amsterdam and a significant positive effect of 1.344 (1.097, 1.647) in 1977-81 in Rotterdam). Sulphur dioxide did not show any clear effects; in Amsterdam a significant negative effect was even found. The same was true for nitrogen dioxide in Amsterdam; in Rotterdam, however, nitrogen dioxide showed non-significant positive effects (RR 0.965, 1.342). Black smoke did not show any clear effects in Amsterdam; in Rotterdam it was positively but not significantly related to the number of admissions. Conclusions - The results show that the relation between short term air pollution and emergency hospital admissions is not always consistent at these rather low levels of daily hospital admissions and of air pollution.
机译:研究目的-评估空气污染与呼吸道疾病每日急诊入院人数之间的短期关系。设计—使用自回归Poisson回归分析数据,以实现过度分散并控制可能的混杂因素,例如季节性和其他时间顺序变量,气象因素和流感流行。设置-荷兰的两个主要城市-阿姆斯特丹(694 700名居民)和鹿特丹(576200名居民)。参加者和测评-使用了由美国国家医疗注册机构(National Medical Registration)每天登记的1977-89年期间因呼吸系统疾病而急诊的医院。 ICD-9编码包括:呼吸道(460-519),慢性阻塞性肺疾病(490-492、494、496)和哮喘(493)。这三种分类的每日总录取次数的平均值(范围)如下:阿姆斯特丹分别为6.70(0-23),1.74(0-9)和1.13(0-7)和4.79(0-19) ,鹿特丹的1.57(0-9)和0.53(0-5)。国家公共卫生和环境保护研究所提供了空气污染测量结果。在荷兰,空气污染水平处于中低水平(“夏季类型”)或低水平(“冬季类型”)。对于“夏季类型”,阿姆斯特丹和鹿特丹的水平差异不大。在1977-89年间,阿姆斯特丹的“夏季类型”污染物(O_3-8h)的臭氧(O_3)的平均值(范围)为86(0-252)μg/ m〜3,在阿姆斯特丹为82(0-286)μg / m〜3在鹿特丹。在阿姆斯特丹,“冬季类型”,污染物,二氧化硫(SO_2-24h)的平均值(范围)为38(0-381)μg/ m〜3,而在阿姆斯特丹为50(1-379)μg/ m〜3。鹿特丹对于黑烟(BS-24h),值分别为14(1-84)μg/ m〜3和28(1-144)μg/ m〜3(1986-89)。主要结果-臭氧对65岁以上≥65岁的人群夏季呼吸道急诊入院人数没有显着积极影响(O_3-8h中100μg/ m〜3增加100μg/ m〜3的相对风险为1.127(0.983,1.292))阿姆斯特丹,在1977-81年在鹿特丹产生了1.344(1.097,1.647)的显着正效应)。二氧化硫没有表现出任何明显的作用。在阿姆斯特丹,甚至发现了严重的负面影响。阿姆斯特丹的二氧化氮也是如此。然而,在鹿特丹,二氧化氮没有表现出明显的正效​​应(RR 0.965,1.342)。黑烟在阿姆斯特丹没有显示出任何明显的影响。在鹿特丹,这与入学人数成正比,但无显着相关。结论-结果表明,在每天住院和空气污染水平较低的情况下,短期空气污染与急诊入院之间的关系并不总是一致的。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号