首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Environmental Management >Comparison of the energetic, environmental, and economic performances of three household-based modern bioenergy utilization systems in China
【24h】

Comparison of the energetic, environmental, and economic performances of three household-based modern bioenergy utilization systems in China

机译:中国三种户基现代生物能源利用系统的能量,环境和经济性能的比较

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

The methods of life cycle assessment and cost-effectiveness analysis were employed to compare the energetic, environmental, and economic performances of three household-based modern bioenergy (MBE) utilization systems: biogas utilization (BGs), biomass briquette utilization for energy only (BBs), and biomass briquette utilization for energy and biochar (BCs). The results showed that all the three MBEs performed positive results in net energy output, which ranged from 0.86 to 3.75 MJ (kg crop residues)~(-1). The positive greenhouse gas reductions also can be acquired when using these three MBEs to substitute for traditional energy, respectively. The cost-effectiveness values of three MBE systems ranged from 343 RMB (tCO_(2e))~(-1) for BGs to 598 RMB (tCO_(2e))~(-1) for BCs (the CO_(2e) indicates the CO_2 equivalent). Considering the supply index analysis results furtherly, the BGs is regarded as the best strategy for the development of MBE in rural households. However, BG leakage during BG digester operations should be received much greater attention to avoid adverse impacts on GHG mitigation.
机译:使用生命周期评估和成本效益分析的方法来比较三个家庭的现代生物能源(MBE)利用系统的能量,环境和经济性能:沼气利用(BGS),仅用于能量的生物量压块利用(BBS )和生物量压块利用能量和生物炭(BCS)。结果表明,所有三种MBE的净能量输出阳性结果为0.86至3.75MJ(千克作物残留物)〜(-1)。在使用这三个MBES替代传统能量时,也可以获得正温室储气量。三种MBE系统的成本效益值范围为BG的343元(TCO_(2E))〜(-1)到BCS的598元(TCO_(2E))〜(-1)(CO_(2E)表示CO_2等效)。考虑到供应指标分析的结果,BGS被认为是农村家庭中MBE发展的最佳策略。然而,BG挖掘机行动期间的BG泄漏应受到更大的注意,以避免对GHG缓解的不利影响。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号