首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Environmental Management >Decommissioning of offshore oil and gas facilities: A comparative assessment of different scenarios
【24h】

Decommissioning of offshore oil and gas facilities: A comparative assessment of different scenarios

机译:海上石油和天然气设施的退役:不同方案的比较评估

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

A material and energy flow analysis, with corresponding financial flows, was carried out for different decommissioning scenarios for the different elements of an offshore oil and gas structure. A comparative assessment was made of the non-financial (especially environmental) outcomes of the different scenarios, with the reference scenario being to leave all structures in situ, while other scenarios envisaged leaving them on the seabed or removing them to shore for recycling and disposal. The costs of each scenario, when compared with the reference scenario, give an implicit valuation of the non-financial outcomes (e.g. environmental improvements), should that scenario be adopted by society. The paper concludes that it is not clear that the removal of the topsides and jackets of large steel structures to shore, as currently required by regulations, is environmentally justified; that concrete structures should certainly be left in place; and that leaving footings, cuttings and pipelines in place, with subsequent monitoring, would also be justified unless very large values were placed by society on a clear seabed and trawling access. (c) 2005 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
机译:针对海上油气结构不同要素的不同退役方案,进行了物料和能量流分析以及相应的资金流。对不同方案的非财务(特别是环境)结果进行了比较评估,参考方案是将所有建筑物留在原地,而其他方案则设想将它们留在海底或移至岸上进行回收和处置。与参考情景相比,每种情景的成本都会隐含评估非财务结果(例如,环境改善),前提是该情景被社会采用。该文件得出的结论是,目前尚不清楚按法规目前的要求将大型钢结构的顶面和外套移至岸上是否符合环境要求;当然应该保留混凝土结构;除非在社会上将很大的价值放在清晰的海底和拖网处,否则将有立足之地、,割和管道,并进行后续监测,也将是合理的。 (c)2005 Elsevier Ltd.保留所有权利。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号