...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Environmental Management >Sustainable development assessment from a capitals perspective: Analytical structure and indicator selection criteria
【24h】

Sustainable development assessment from a capitals perspective: Analytical structure and indicator selection criteria

机译:从首都角度进行可持续发展评估:分析结构和指标选择标准

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

Sustainable development assessment has been conducted considering its various dimensions, such as environmental, social, cultural and economic. In this paper, the representation of such dimensions is undertaken from the perspective of the natural, social and built capitals. These dimensions are usually represented by indicators, indexes and systems of indicators, but their abundance in the technical and scientific literatures without adequate analytical structures can impair assessment quality and speed. This study aimed to propose a structure for sustainable development assessment whereby key aspects and indicators can be identified, prioritised and meaningfully used from the perspective of sustainable development capitals. Content analysis of selected international papers and technical reports was undertaken to identify relevant analysis elements and their hierarchical order. This has led to a four-tier framework composed of three capitals, seven categories, 19 subcategories and 52 attributes, each of which can be measured with the aid of one or more locally relevant indicator(s) in the context of sustainable development assessment. Selection criteria for such indicators were compiled from the literature and are presented in terms of their political, management, data quality and economic relevance. This study may contribute to the development and refinement of structured sustainable development indicator systems with less analytical ambiguity, overlapping and gaps, and hence improve the representativeness of future assessment efforts.
机译:考虑到环境,社会,文化和经济等各个方面,进行了可持续发展评估。在本文中,从自然资本,社会资本和建筑资本的角度进行了此类维度的表示。这些维度通常由指标,指标和指标体系来表示,但是如果技术和科学文献中的内容丰富,而缺乏适当的分析结构,则会损害评估质量和速度。这项研究旨在提出一种可持续发展评估的结构,从可持续发展资本的角度可以确定,确定优先次序和有意义地利用这些关键方面和指标。对选定的国际论文和技术报告进行了内容分析,以确定相关的分析要素及其层次顺序。这导致了一个四层框架,由三个首都,七个类别,19个子类别和52个属性组成,在可持续发展评估的背景下,可以借助一项或多项与当地相关的指标来对每一项进行衡量。这些指标的选择标准是从文献中汇编的,并从其政治,管理,数据质量和经济相关性方面进行了介绍。这项研究可能有助于发展和完善结构化的可持续发展指标体系,减少分析的歧义,重叠和差距,从而提高未来评估工作的代表性。

著录项

  • 来源
    《Journal of Environmental Management》 |2020年第15期|110147.1-110147.10|共10页
  • 作者单位

    Graduate Programme in Environmental Management Universidade Positivo R. Prof. Pedro Viriato Parigot de Soma 5300 - Campo Comprido Curitiba/PR 81280-330 Brazil Department of Business Management Ponta Grossa State University Praca Santos Andrade 01 - Centro Ponta Grossa/PR 84010-919 Brazil;

    Graduate Programme in Urban Environmental Sustainability Federal University of Technology - Parana Av. Sete de Setembro 3165 - Reboucas Curitiba/PR 80230-901 Brazil;

    Graduate Programme in Environmental Management Universidade Positivo R. Prof. Pedro Viriato Parigot de Soma 5300 - Campo Comprido Curitiba/PR 81280-330 Brazil;

    Department of Hydraulics and Sanitation Federal University of Parana Av. Cel Francisco H. dos Santos 210 - Jardim das Americas Curitiba/PR 81130-001 Brazil;

  • 收录信息 美国《科学引文索引》(SCI);美国《化学文摘》(CA);
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

    Sustainable development capitals; Indicator system; Selection criteria; Analytical structure;

    机译:可持续发展之都;指标体系;选择标准;分析结构;

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号