首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Environmental Management >Evaluation of environmental management resources (ISO 14001) at civil engineering construction worksites: A case study of the community of Madrid
【24h】

Evaluation of environmental management resources (ISO 14001) at civil engineering construction worksites: A case study of the community of Madrid

机译:土木工程施工现场环境管理资源评估(ISO 14001):以马德里社区为例

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

In recent years, significant advances have been made in business organization and management. The growing demands of clients as well as the globalization of world markets are among the many factors that have led to the establishment of systems of quality control and environmental management as a competitive strategy for businesses. When compared to other professional sectors, the construction sector has been slower to respond to environmental problems and to adopt Environmental Management Systems (EMS). In the world today the ISO 14001 standard is currently the main frame of reference used by construction companies to implement this type of management system. This article presents the results of a general study regarding the evaluation of the application of the ISO 14001 standard at civil engineering construction worksites in the Community of Madrid (Spain), specifically pertaining to requirement 4.4.1, Resources, roles, responsibilities, and authority. According to requirement 4.4.1, company executives should appoint people responsible for implementing the EMS and also specify their responsibilities and functions. The personnel designated for supervising environmental work should also have sufficient authority to establish and maintain the EMS. The results obtained were the following: - EMS supervisors did not generally possess adequate training and solid experience in construction work and in the environment. Furthermore, supervisors were usually forced to combine their environmental work with other tasks, which made their job even more difficult. - Generally speaking, supervisors were not given sufficient authority and autonomy because productivity at the construction site had priority over environmental management. This was due to the fact that the company management did not have a respectful attitude toward the environment, nor was the management actively involved in the establishment of the EMS. - Insufficient resources were allocated to the Environmental Management Unit. As a result, the application of EMSs in construction projects often appeared to be more of a formality, which was merely a way of maintaining the certification of the Environmental Management System. It was more a means of meeting the requirements for submitting a tender to contracting organisms rather than an indicator of any real commitment to improving the environmental performance of construction companies.
机译:近年来,业务组织和管理已取得重大进展。客户不断增长的需求以及世界市场的全球化是导致建立质量控制和环境管理体系作为企业竞争策略的众多因素之一。与其他专业部门相比,建筑部门对环境问题的响应和采用环境管理系统(EMS)的速度较慢。在当今世界,ISO 14001标准目前是建筑公司用于实施此类管理系统的主要参考框架。本文介绍了一项有关在马德里社区(西班牙)的土木工程施工现场对ISO 14001标准的应用进行评估的一般研究结果,特别涉及要求4.4.1,资源,角色,职责和权限。根据要求4.4.1,公司高管应任命负责实施环境管理体系的人员,并规定其职责和职能。指派负责监督环境工作的人员也应具有足够的权限来建立和维护环境管理体系。获得的结果如下:-EMS主管通常没有在建筑工作和环境中接受足够的培训和扎实的经验。此外,主管通常被迫将环境工作与其他任务结合在一起,这使他们的工作更加困难。 -一般而言,监理人员没有足够的权限和自主权,因为建筑工地的生产率高于环境管理。这是由于以下事实:公司管理层对环境没有尊重的态度,管理层也没有积极参与建立EMS。 -分配给环境管理股的资源不足。结果,环境管理体系在建筑项目中的应用似乎更多是一种形式,这仅仅是维持环境管理体系认证的一种方式。它更是满足向承包生物进行招标的要求的一种手段,而不是表明任何对改善建筑公司的环境绩效的真正承诺的指标。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号