Corrigendum: A revealed preference approach to valuing non-market recreational fishing losses from the Deepwater Horizon spill (J. Environ. Manag. 145, 2014,199-209)

摘要

The methodology and results documented in Alvarez et al. (2014) and the alternative loss aggregation scenarios discussed here could help inform a compensation process for losses in recreational use of state and Federal waters associated with the Deepwater Horizon oil spill. However, state and Federal trustees, responsible parties, mediators, and all other parties involved in the process must be cognizant of the different assumptions used in our analysis. Similarly, the appropriate scenario and assumptions used for aggregation must be determined as part of the compensation process by the interested parties, as the scenarios discussed here are mostly for purposes of illustrating how the results in Alvarez et al. (2014) can be used for finding aggregate loss measures when examining recreational choices across a broad region.