首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Environmental Management >Decentralised schemes for integrated management of wastewater and domestic organic waste: the case of a small community
【24h】

Decentralised schemes for integrated management of wastewater and domestic organic waste: the case of a small community

机译:废水和生活有机废物综合管理的权力下放计划:以小社区为例

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

This study assesses from an environmental perspective two different configurations for the combined treatment of wastewater and domestic organic waste (DOW) in a small and decentralised community having a population of 2000. The applied schemes consist of an upflow anaerobic blanket (UASB) as core treatment process. Scheme A integrates membranes with the anaerobic treatment; while in Scheme B biological removal of nutrients in a sequencing batch reactor (SBR) is applied as a post treatment to UASB effluent. In energy-related categories, the main contributor is electricity consumption (producing 18 -50% of the impacts); whereas in terms of eutrophication-related categories, the discharge of the treated effluent arises as a major hotspot (with 57-99% of the impacts). Scheme B consumes 25% more electricity and produces 40% extra sludge than Scheme A, resulting in worse environmental results for those energy categories. However, the environmental impact due to the discharge of the treated effluent is 75% lower in eutrophication categories due to the removal of nutrients. In addition, the quality of the final effluent in Scheme B would allow its use for irrigation (9.6 mg N/L and 2 mg P/L) if proper tertiary treatment and disinfection are provided, expanding its potential adoption at a wider scale. Direct emissions due to the dissolved methane in the UASB effluent have a significant environmental impact in climate change (23 -26%). Additionally, the study shows the environmental feasibility of the use of food waste disposers for DOW collection in different integration rates.
机译:这项研究从环境角度评估了在人口为2000的小型分散社区中废水和生活有机废物(DOW)联合处理的两种不同配置。应用的方案包括上流厌氧毯(UASB)作为核心处理处理。方案A将膜与厌氧处理结合在一起;而在方案B中,在顺序分批反应器(SBR)中对营养物进行生物去除是对UASB废水的后处理。在能源相关类别中,主要的贡献是电力消耗(产生的影响为18 -50%);而与富营养化相关的类别而言,处理后的废水排放是主要的热点(影响占57-99%)。方案B比方案A多消耗25%的电能,并产生40%的额外污泥,从而导致这些能源类别的环境结果恶化。但是,由于营养物质的去除,在富营养化类别中,由于排放处理过的废水而造成的环境影响要降低75%。此外,如果提供了适当的三次处理和消毒,方案B中最终废水的质量将使其可用于灌溉(9.6 mg N / L和2 mg P / L),从而扩大了其潜在的应用范围。 UASB废水中溶解的甲烷导致的直接排放对气候变化具有重大的环境影响(23 -26%)。此外,研究显示了以不同的整合率使用食物垃圾处理器进行DOW收集的环境可行性。

著录项

  • 来源
    《Journal of Environmental Management》 |2017年第2期|732-740|共9页
  • 作者单位

    Department of Chemical Engineering, Institute of Technology, University of Santiago de Composteta, Spain,Department of Mechanical, Aerospace and Civil Engineering, Institute of Environment, Health and Societies, Brunei University London, UK;

    Department of Water Resources and Environmental Engineering, School of Civil Engineering, National Technical University of Athens, Greece;

    Department of Chemical Engineering, Institute of Technology, University of Santiago de Composteta, Spain;

    Department of Chemical Engineering, Institute of Technology, University of Santiago de Composteta, Spain;

    Department of Biotechnology, University of Verona, Italy;

    Department of Mechanical, Aerospace and Civil Engineering, Institute of Environment, Health and Societies, Brunei University London, UK;

  • 收录信息 美国《科学引文索引》(SCI);美国《化学文摘》(CA);
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

    Anaerobic treatment; Decentralised systems; Domestic wastewater; Short-cut nitrification denitrification; LCA;

    机译:厌氧处理;分散系统;生活污水;短程硝化反硝化;生命周期评价;

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号