首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Environmental Management >Management effectiveness evaluation in protected areas of southern Ecuador
【24h】

Management effectiveness evaluation in protected areas of southern Ecuador

机译:厄瓜多尔南部保护区的管理成效评估

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Protected areas are home to biodiversity, habitats and ecosystem as well as a critical component of human well-being and a generator of leisure-related revenues. However, management is sometimes unsatisfactory and requires new ways of evaluation. Management effectiveness of 36 protected areas in southern Ecuador have been assessed. The protected areas belong to three categories: Heritage of Natural Areas of the Ecuadorian State (PANE), created and funded by the State, Areas of Forest and Protective Vegetation (ABVP), created but no funded by the State, and private reserves, declared and funded by private entities. Management effectiveness was evaluated by answers of managers of the protected areas to questionnaires adapted to the socio-economic and environmental characteristics of the region. Questions were classified into six elements of evaluation: context, planning, inputs, processes, outputs and outcomes as recommended by IUCN. Results were classified into four levels: unsatisfactory, slightly satisfactory, satisfactory and very satisfactory. The PANE areas and private reserves showed higher management effectiveness levels (satisfactory and very satisfactory) than ABVP areas, where slightly satisfactory and unsatisfactory levels prevailed. Resources availability was found as the main reason behind this difference. The extension, age and province of location were found irrelevant. Outputs, inputs and processes require main efforts to improve management effectiveness. Improving planning and input in the PANE areas and inputs and outcomes on ABVP areas is necessary to obtain a similar result in all areas.
机译:保护区是生物多样性,栖息地和生态系统的家园,是人类福祉的重要组成部分,是休闲相关收入的来源。但是,管理有时不能令人满意,需要新的评估方法。评估了厄瓜多尔南部36个保护区的管理有效性。保护区分为三类:由国家创建和资助的厄瓜多尔国家自然区遗产(PANE),由国家创建但未资助的森林和保护性植被区(ABVP)和宣布的私人保护区由私人实体提供资金。通过保护区管理人员对适合该区域社会经济和环境特征的调查表的答复,评估了管理效力。根据自然保护联盟的建议,将问题分为六个评估要素:情境,计划,投入,过程,产出和成果。结果分为四个级别:不满意,稍满意,满意和非常满意。与ABVP区域相比,PANE区域和私人保护区的管理有效性水平(令人满意和非常令人满意)更高,ABVP区域的管理有效性水平普遍较高和不令人满意。发现资源可用性是造成这种差异的主要原因。发现扩展名,年龄和位置的省无关紧要。产出,投入和过程需要作出重大努力以提高管理效率。为了在所有领域都获得类似的结果,有必要改进PANE领域的计划和投入以及ABVP领域的投入和成果。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号