...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Environmental Management >Estimating economic and environmental trade-offs of managing nitrogen in Australian sugarcane systems taking agronomic risk into account
【24h】

Estimating economic and environmental trade-offs of managing nitrogen in Australian sugarcane systems taking agronomic risk into account

机译:考虑到农业风险,估算澳大利亚甘蔗系统中氮素管理的经济和环境平衡

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Use of chemical agricultural inputs such as nitrogen fertilisers (N) in agricultural production can cause diffuse source pollution thereby degrading the health of coastal and marine ecosystems in coastal river catchments. Previous reviewed economic assessments of N management in agricultural production seldom consider broader environmental impacts and uncertain climatic and economic conditions. This paper presents an economic risk framework for assessing economic and environmental trade-offs of N management strategies taking into account variable climatic and economic conditions. The framework is underpinned by a modelling platform that integrates Agricultural Production System sIMulation modelling (APSIM), probability theory, Monte Carlo simulation, and financial risk analysis techniques. We applied the framework to a case study in Tully, a coastal catchment in north-eastern Australia with a well-documented N pollution problem. Our results show that switching from managing N to maximise private net returns to maximising social net returns could reduce expected private net returns by $99 ha(-1), but yield additional environmental benefits equal to $191 ha(-1). Further, switching from managing N to maximise private returns in years with the highest profit potential (hereafter, good years) to maximising mean social net returns could reduce expected private profits in good years by $277 ha(-1), but yield additional environmental benefits equal to $287 ha(-1). We contend that it is essential to incorporate farmer risk behaviour and environmental impacts in analyses that inform policies aimed at enhancing adoption of management activities for mitigating deterioration of the health of coastal and marine ecosystems due to diffuse source pollution from agricultural production.
机译:在农业生产中使用化学农业投入品,例如氮肥(N)可能会造成污染源扩散,从而降低沿海河流流域沿海和海洋生态系统的健康状况。先前审查过的农业生产中氮管理的经济评估很少考虑更广泛的环境影响以及不确定的气候和经济条件。本文提出了一个经济风险框架,该评估框架考虑了可变的气候和经济条件,评估了N种管理策略的经济和环境权衡。该框架由集成了农业生产系统模拟模型(APSIM),概率论,蒙特卡洛模拟和金融风险分析技术的建模平台支撑。我们将该框架应用于澳大利亚东北部沿海流域塔利(Tully)的案例研究中,该案例具有充分记录的氮污染问题。我们的结果表明,从管理N最大化私人净回报到最大化社会净回报可能会使预期的私人净回报减少$ 99 ha(-1),但会产生等于$ 191 ha(-1)的额外环境效益。此外,从管理N到在潜在利润最高的年份(以下称好年)中最大化私人回报,到最大化平均社会净回报,可能会使好年份的预期私人利润减少277 ha(-1),但会带来额外的环境效益等于$ 287公顷(-1)。我们认为,必须在分析中纳入农民的风险行为和环境影响,以便为旨在加强管理活动采用的政策提供信息,以减轻由于农业生产造成的源污染造成的沿海和海洋生态系统健康恶化。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号