首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Environmental Management >Adoption of Farm Management Systems for Cross Compliance - An empirical case in Germany
【24h】

Adoption of Farm Management Systems for Cross Compliance - An empirical case in Germany

机译:采用农场管理系统实现交叉合规-在德国的一个案例

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

In Germany, Farm Management Systems (FMS) have been introduced as a support to farmers' compliance with environmental and other regulations, aiming at the increase of farm level performance and sustainable farming practices. Different kinds of FMS were developed and promulgated with various approaches, determined by each federal state's agricultural advisory system. Knowledge on the FMS' uptake and effectiveness has been lacking so far. The overall aim of this paper is to provide an analysis of the implementation process and selected outcomes of the policy-driven instrumental innovation of FMS. In particular, the objectives are i) to reveal how and with what success the introduction of FMS has been realised in Germany and ii) to analyse and discuss the FMS' adoption in the federal state of Brandenburg. For the first part of the study, we elaborate a situational analysis of the policy implementation through a desk study and expert interviews. In the second part, selected results from a farmers' survey in Brandenburg are presented and a switching regression model is developed to assess the factors responsible for the uptake of FMS and to understand the role of FMS in improving the confidence in complying with Cross Compliance regulations. We found a high degree of diversity among FMS developed in the different federal states. FMS adoption rates varied, but were generally low. Institutional environment seems to have a significant influence as the same FMS had very different adoption rates among federal states. For Brandenburg, our findings show that farmers' confidence to face CC check was increased by the adoption of FMS. However, counterfactual scenario analysis proved that especially farmers who did not adopt FMS would have benefitted most if they had adopted the tool. Our study shows that there is a need for systems supporting farmers in dealing with bureaucratic requirements. Future FMS should be easy to understand, adaptable to individual farmers' needs and be available at low costs. Furthermore, there is a need to design FMS in a participatory way that integrates farmers' expectations. (C) 2018 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd.
机译:在德国,引入了农场管理系统(FMS)以支持农民遵守环境法规和其他法规,旨在提高农场一级的绩效和可持续的耕作方式。开发了各种FMS,并通过各种方法颁布,这些方法由每个联邦州的农业咨询系统确定。到目前为止,对FMS的使用和有效性缺乏了解。本文的总体目标是对FMS的政策驱动工具创新的实施过程和选定结果进行分析。具体而言,目标是:i)揭示在德国如何以及以何种方式成功引入FMS;以及ii)分析和讨论FMS在勃兰登堡联邦州的采用。在研究的第一部分,我们通过案头研究和专家访谈详细阐述了政策实施的情况分析。在第二部分中,介绍了勃兰登堡州农民调查的部分结果,并建立了转换回归模型,以评估造成FMS吸收的因素,并了解FMS在提高对遵守交叉法规规定的信心方面的作用。 。我们发现在不同联邦州开发的FMS之间存在高度差异。 FMS的采用率各不相同,但普遍较低。制度环境似乎具有重大影响,因为同一FMS在联邦各州之间的采用率差异很大。对于勃兰登堡州,我们的发现表明,采用FMS可以提高农民面对CC检查的信心。但是,反事实情景分析证明,特别是那些不采用FMS的农民,如果采用了FMS,将受益最大。我们的研究表明,需要一种支持农民应对官僚主义要求的系统。未来的FMS应该易于理解,适应个体农民的需求并且价格低廉。此外,有必要以一种参与式的方式设计FMS,以融合农民的期望。 (C)2018作者。由Elsevier Ltd.发布

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号