首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Environmental Management >Extended Producer Responsibility and corporate performance: Effects of environmental regulation and environmental strategy
【24h】

Extended Producer Responsibility and corporate performance: Effects of environmental regulation and environmental strategy

机译:生产者扩展责任和企业绩效:环境法规和环境战略的影响

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

While contemporary manufacturing technologies stimulate the industrial revolution and promote the rapidly changing global economy, it has caused enormous environmental negative externalities and managing the industrial waste remains a primary challenge, especially for fast developing countries such as China. Though existing studies explored the influence of Extended Producer Responsibility (EPR) legislations on environmental externalities, only fewer researches aimed at policy issues. Particularly, the relationship among environmental regulations, environmental strategies and corporate performance in the EPR system has not been deeply investigated. To fill this gap, this research will focus to assess the economic aspect and environmental performance associated with the environmental regulations and strategies. For this purpose, 208 cross-sectional questionnaires were administered with three major high-pollution industries, electrical and electronic, automobile and lead-acid storage battery industries. To accomplish this study objective, we employ a two-step approach: firstly, validity tests for environmental regulation and environmental strategy along with the corporate performance are performed by the factor analysis method, and secondly, the structural equation model is utilized to test the study hypotheses. Results reveal that command and control (CAC) and market-based incentive (MBI) environmental regulations are significantly impacting on the reactive environmental strategy (RES); however, the proactive environmental strategy (PES) only has a significant relationship with MBI regulation. On the other hand, RES only has a significant relationship with the enterprises economics performance, while PES has a statistically significant relationship with both economic and environmental performance of enterprises. Therefore, the central government and its local offices are strongly urged to coordinate the industries by making, implementing and monitoring necessary and feasible environmental laws and regulations.
机译:尽管当代制造业技术刺激了工业革命并促进了快速变化的全球经济,但它却造成了巨大的环境负面外部影响,而管理工业废物仍然是主要的挑战,特别是对于像中国这样的快速发展中国家而言。尽管现有研究探讨了生产者延伸责任(EPR)立法对环境外部性的影响,但针对政策问题的研究很少。特别是,EPR系统中的环境法规,环境战略与企业绩效之间的关系尚未得到深入研究。为了填补这一空白,本研究将重点评估与环境法规和策略相关的经济方面和环境绩效。为此,对三个主要的高污染行业(电气和电子,汽车和铅酸蓄电池行业)进行了208份横断面问卷调查。为了实现此研究目标,我们采用两步法:首先,通过因子分析方法对环境法规和环境策略以及公司绩效进行有效性测试,其次,使用结构方程模型对研究进行测试。假设。结果表明,指挥与控制(CAC)和基于市场的激励(MBI)环境法规对反应性环境战略(RES)有重大影响;但是,积极的环境策略(PES)仅与MBI监管有重要关系。另一方面,RES仅与企业的经济绩效有显着关系,而PES与企业的经济和环境绩效在统计上有显着关系。因此,强烈要求中央政府及其地方机构通过制定,实施和监测必要且可行的环境法律法规来协调行业。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号