首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Environmental Management >Evaluating how variants of floristic quality assessment indicate wetland condition
【24h】

Evaluating how variants of floristic quality assessment indicate wetland condition

机译:评价植物质量评估的变体如何指示湿地状况

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Biological indicators are useful tools for the assessment of ecosystem condition. Multi-metric and multi-taxa indicators may respond to a broader range of disturbances than simpler indicators, but their complexity can make them difficult to interpret, which is critical to indicator utility for ecosystem management. Floristic Quality Assessment (FQA) is an example of a biological assessment approach that has been widely tested for indicating freshwater wetland condition, but less attention has been given to clarifying the factors controlling its response. FQA quantifies the aggregate of vascular plant species tolerance to habitat degradation (conservatism), and model variants have incorporated species richness, abundance, and indigenity (native or non-native). To assess bias, we tested FQA variants in open-canopy freshwater wetlands against three independent reference measures, using practical vegetation sampling methods. FQA variants incorporating species richness did not correlate with our reference measures and were influenced by wetland size and hydrogeomorphic class. In contrast, FQA variants lacking measures of species richness responded linearly to reference measures quantifying individual and aggregate stresses, suggesting a broad response to cumulative degradation. FQA variants incorporating non-native species, and a variant additionally incorporating relative species abundance, improved performance over using only native species. We relate our empirical findings to ecological theory to clarify the functional properties and implications of the FQA variants. Our analysis indicates that (1) aggregate conservatism reliably declines with increased disturbance; (2) species richness has varying relationships with disturbance and increases with site area, confounding FQA response; and (3) non-native species signal human disturbance. We propose that incorporating species abundance can improve FQA site-level relevance with little extra sampling effort. Using our practical sampling methods, an FQA variant ignoring species richness and incorporating non-native species and relative species abundance can be logistically efficient, easily understood, and effective for wetland assessment.
机译:生物指标是评估生态系统状况的有用工具。与简单的指标相比,多指标和多类目指标可能对更广泛的干扰做出响应,但是它们的复杂性可能使它们难以解释,这对于生态系统管理指标的实用性至关重要。植物质量评估(FQA)是一种生物学评估方法的示例,该方法已被广泛测试以指示淡水湿地状况,但很少有人关注澄清控制其响应的因素。 FQA量化了维管束植物物种对栖息地退化(保守性)的耐受性总量,并且模型变体结合了物种丰富度,丰度和本土性(原生或非原生)。为了评估偏差,我们使用实用的植被采样方法,针对三种独立的参考措施,在开放式冠层淡水湿地中测试了FQA变体。结合物种丰富性的FQA变体与我们的参考指标不相关,并且受湿地大小和水文地貌类别的影响。相比之下,缺乏物种丰富度度量的FQA变体对量化个体和总体胁迫的参考度量线性响应,表明对累积退化具有广泛的响应。与仅使用本地物种相比,合并了非本地物种的FQA变体以及另外包含相对物种丰富度的FQA变体提高了性能。我们将我们的经验发现与生态理论联系起来,以阐明FQA变体的功能特性和含义。我们的分析表明:(1)总体保守性随着干扰的增加而可靠地下降; (2)物种丰富度与干扰具有不同的关系,并随着站点面积的增加而增加,从而混淆了FQA响应; (3)非本地物种发出人为干扰信号。我们建议纳入物种丰度可以提高FQA站点级别的相关性,而几乎不需要额外的采样工作。使用我们的实用采样方法,可以忽略物种丰富度并结合非本地物种和相对物种的丰度的FQA变种在逻辑上高效,容易理解并且对湿地评估有效。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号