首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Environmental Management >Traditional cattle vs. introduced deer management in Chaco Serrano woodlands (Argentina): Analysis of environmental sustainability at increasing densities
【24h】

Traditional cattle vs. introduced deer management in Chaco Serrano woodlands (Argentina): Analysis of environmental sustainability at increasing densities

机译:Chaco Serrano林地(阿根廷)的传统牛与引进的鹿管理:密度增加时的环境可持续性分析

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Wild ungulate populations have increased and expanded considerably in many regions, including austral woodlands and forests where deer (Cervus elaphus) have been introduced as an alternative management to traditional cattle grazing. In this study, we compared traditional cattle with introduced deer management at increasing deer densities in the "Chaco Serrano" woodlands of Argentina to assess their ecological sustainability. We used three ecological indicators (abundance of tree regeneration, woody plant diversity and browsing damage) as proxies for environmental sustainability in woody systems. Our results indicate that traditional cattle management, at stocking rates of -10 ind km~(-2), was the most ecologically sustainable management since it allowed greater tree regeneration abundance, higher richness of woody species and lower browsing damage. Importantly, cattle management and deer management at low densities (10 ind km~(-2)) showed no significant differences in species richness and abundance of seedlings, although deer caused greater browsing damage on saplings and juveniles. However, management regimes involving high deer densities (-35 deer km~2) was highly unsustainable in comparison to low (-10 deer km~(-2)) and medium (-20 deer km~(-2)) densities, with 40% probability of unsustainable browsing as opposed to less than 5% probability at low and medium densities. In addition, high deer densities caused a strong reduction in tree regeneration, with a 19-30% reduction in the abundance of seedlings and young trees when compared to low deer densities. These results showed that the effect of increasing deer densities on woody plant conservation was not linear, with high deer densities causing a disproportional deleterious effect on tree regeneration and sustainable browsing. Our results suggest that traditional management at low densities or the use of introduced ungulates (deer breeding areas) at low-medium densities (<20 deer km~(-2)) are compatible with woody vegetation conservation. However, further research is needed on plant palatability, animal habitat use (spatial heterogeneity) and species turnover and extinction (comparison to areas of low-null historical browsing) to better estimate environmental sustainability of Neotropical ungulate-dominated woodlands.
机译:在许多地区,野生有蹄类动物的种群已大大增加和扩展,包括南方的林地和森林,在这些森林中引入了鹿(鹿)作为传统放牧的替代管理方式。在这项研究中,我们比较了阿根廷“ Chaco Serrano”林地中增加鹿密度的传统牛和引入鹿管理的情况,以评估其生态可持续性。我们使用了三个生态指标(树木再生丰富,木本植物多样性和浏览危害)作为木本系统环境可持续性的代表。我们的结果表明,以-10 ind km〜(-2)的放养率进行传统的牛群管理是最生态可持续的管理,因为它允许更大的树木再生丰度,更高的木本物种丰富度和更低的浏览危害。重要的是,低密度(10 ind km〜(-2))的牲畜管理和鹿管理在物种丰富度和幼苗丰度上没有显着差异,尽管鹿对幼树和幼鸟造成更大的浏览伤害。然而,与低密度(-10鹿km〜(-2))和中密度(-20鹿km〜(-2))相比,涉及高鹿密度(-35鹿km〜(2))的管理制度极不可持续。不可持续浏览的概率为40%,而中低密度浏览的概率不到5%。此外,高鹿密度导致树木再生能力大大降低,与低鹿密度相比,幼苗和幼树的丰度降低了19-30%。这些结果表明,增加鹿密度对木本植物保护的影响不是线性的,高鹿密度对树木的再生和可持续浏览造成不成比例的有害影响。我们的结果表明,在低密度下进行传统管理或在中密度下(<20鹿km〜(-2))使用引入的有蹄类动物(鹿繁殖区)与木本植物保护相适应。但是,还需要对植物的适口性,动物栖息地的利用(空间异质性)以及物种更新和灭绝(与低空历史浏览区域进行比较)进行进一步研究,以更好地估计新热带无蹄类动物为主的林地的环境可持续性。

著录项

  • 来源
    《Journal of Environmental Management》 |2018年第15期|642-649|共8页
  • 作者单位

    Departamento de Sistemas y Recursos Naturnles, Universidad Politecnica de Madrid, Ciudad Universitaria, s, 28040 Madrid, Spain;

    Departamento de Sistemas y Recursos Naturnles, Universidad Politecnica de Madrid, Ciudad Universitaria, s, 28040 Madrid, Spain;

    Departamento de Sistemas y Recursos Naturnles, Universidad Politecnica de Madrid, Ciudad Universitaria, s, 28040 Madrid, Spain,Department of Biology, Stanford University, 371 Sena Mall, Stanford, CA 94305, USA;

  • 收录信息 美国《科学引文索引》(SCI);美国《化学文摘》(CA);
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

    Herbivory; Stocking rates; Sustainable browsing; Tree regeneration; Wild ungulate management; Plant diversity;

    机译:食草库存率;可持续浏览;树木再生;野生有蹄类动物管理;植物多样性;
  • 入库时间 2022-08-17 13:31:48

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号