...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Environmental Economics and Management >Positive framing does not solve the tragedy of the commons
【24h】

Positive framing does not solve the tragedy of the commons

机译:积极的框架并不能解决公地的悲剧

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

We investigate whether positive framing increases cooperation in three social dilemmas with slightly different properties: a linear public goods (PG) game, a non-linear PG game, and a common pool resource (CPR) game. Results from our laboratory experiments show that contributions to a linear PG are higher if the externality is framed positively, rather than negatively, corroborating earlier findings by Andreoni (1995). By contrast, we find no such framing effects in the non-linear PG game or the CPR game. In these games, the best response in the material payoffs is to contribute less if others contribute more, counteracting effects of pro-social preferences. Positive framing therefore does not help to solve the tragedy of the commons. (C) 2018 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
机译:我们调查积极构架是否会在三个性质稍有不同的社会困境中增加合作:线性公共物品(PG)游戏,非线性PG游戏和公共资源库(CPR)游戏。我们实验室实验的结果表明,如果外部性是正面而非负面地构架,则对线性PG的贡献就更高,这证实了Andreoni(1995)的早期发现。相比之下,我们在非线性PG游戏或CPR游戏中没有发现这种成帧效应。在这些游戏中,物质回报的最佳反应是,如果其他人贡献更多,则贡献更少,从而抵消亲社会偏好的影响。因此,积极构架无助于解决公地的悲剧。 (C)2018 Elsevier Inc.保留所有权利。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号